From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751584AbWCBR5i (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:57:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751445AbWCBR5h (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:57:37 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:63969 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751129AbWCBR5h (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:57:37 -0500 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060302092854.2818e98c.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060302092854.2818e98c.akpm@osdl.org> <20060301162113.774d1745.akpm@osdl.org> <20060301173617.16639.83553.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <3718.1141299945@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: Andrew Morton Cc: David Howells , torvalds@osdl.org, steved@redhat.com, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, aviro@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Permit NFS superblock sharing [try #2] X-Mailer: MH-E 7.92+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50.4 Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 17:57:18 +0000 Message-ID: <13560.1141322238@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton wrote: > Why do you assume that? Why shouldn't I? If I build my patches against Trond's tree instead of Linus's, it may still not apply to your -mm tree. > nfs-apply-mount-root-dentry-override-to-filesystems: > 3 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/nfs/inode.c.rej Would it help you if I split the NFS bits out of patch 2 into a separate patch? > Ordinarily, yes. But for something like this you should work against the > NFS development tree, not against mainline. Okay. David