From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: ": Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: [PATCH] ima: fallback to MODULE_SIG_ENFORCE for existing kernel module syscall
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:02:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1356235377.3696.5.camel@falcor> (raw)
The new kernel module syscall appraises kernel modules based
on policy. If the IMA policy requires kernel module checking,
fallback to module signature enforcing for the existing syscall,
if enabled. Otherwise return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN.
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@us.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 1 +
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 12 ++++++++----
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
index 3b2adb7..079a85d 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ void ima_delete_rules(void);
/* Appraise integrity measurements */
#define IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE 0x01
#define IMA_APPRAISE_FIX 0x02
+#define IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES 0x04
#ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE
int ima_appraise_measurement(struct integrity_iint_cache *iint,
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index 45de18e..60bd509 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -291,11 +291,15 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ima_file_check);
*/
int ima_module_check(struct file *file)
{
- int rc;
+ int rc = 0;
- if (!file)
- rc = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
- else
+ if (!file) {
+ if (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES) {
+#ifndef CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE
+ rc = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
+#endif
+ }
+ } else
rc = process_measurement(file, file->f_dentry->d_name.name,
MAY_EXEC, MODULE_CHECK);
return (ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_ENFORCE) ? rc : 0;
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index af7d182..479fca9 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -523,7 +523,8 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
}
if (!result && (entry->action == UNKNOWN))
result = -EINVAL;
-
+ else if (entry->func == MODULE_CHECK)
+ ima_appraise |= IMA_APPRAISE_MODULES;
audit_log_format(ab, "res=%d", !result);
audit_log_end(ab);
return result;
--
1.7.7.6
reply other threads:[~2012-12-23 4:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1356235377.3696.5.camel@falcor \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox