From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932704Ab3AJCDT (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:03:19 -0500 Received: from server.prisktech.co.nz ([115.188.14.127]:53083 "EHLO server.prisktech.co.nz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757821Ab3AJCDR (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 21:03:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1357783407.28830.2.camel@gitbox> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850 From: Tony Prisk To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Olof Johansson , vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@googlegroups.com, arm@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:03:27 +1300 In-Reply-To: <201301092127.05804.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1356650452-16559-1-git-send-email-linux@prisktech.co.nz> <1357758570.27076.8.camel@gitbox> <201301092127.05804.arnd@arndb.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: > > I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. > > > > Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so > > everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches > > have already been applied. > > > > Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? > > Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer > them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed > tag, that gives automatically puts nice text into the merge > changeset. > > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? > > Yes. > > Arnd This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) Regards Tony P