From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/17] workqueue: replace for_each_worker_pool() with for_each_std_worker_pool()
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358386969-945-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358386969-945-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
for_each_std_worker_pool() takes @cpu instead of @gcwq.
This is part of an effort to remove global_cwq and make worker_pool
the top level abstraction, which in turn will help implementing worker
pools with user-specified attributes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 766ca67..81f041f 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -277,9 +277,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(system_freezable_wq);
#define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
#include <trace/events/workqueue.h>
-#define for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) \
- for ((pool) = &(gcwq)->pools[0]; \
- (pool) < &(gcwq)->pools[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS]; (pool)++)
+#define for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) \
+ for ((pool) = &get_gcwq((cpu))->pools[0]; \
+ (pool) < &get_gcwq((cpu))->pools[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS]; (pool)++)
#define for_each_busy_worker(worker, i, pos, pool) \
hash_for_each(pool->busy_hash, i, pos, worker, hentry)
@@ -3509,14 +3509,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(work_busy);
static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
- struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(smp_processor_id());
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct worker *worker;
struct hlist_node *pos;
int i;
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
- BUG_ON(pool->cpu != smp_processor_id());
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
+ BUG_ON(cpu != smp_processor_id());
mutex_lock(&pool->assoc_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
@@ -3550,15 +3550,15 @@ static void gcwq_unbind_fn(struct work_struct *work)
/*
* Sched callbacks are disabled now. Zap nr_running. After this,
* nr_running stays zero and need_more_worker() and keep_working()
- * are always true as long as the worklist is not empty. @gcwq now
- * behaves as unbound (in terms of concurrency management) gcwq
- * which is served by workers tied to the CPU.
+ * are always true as long as the worklist is not empty. Pools on
+ * @cpu now behave as unbound (in terms of concurrency management)
+ * pools which are served by workers tied to the CPU.
*
* On return from this function, the current worker would trigger
* unbound chain execution of pending work items if other workers
* didn't already.
*/
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq)
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu)
atomic_set(get_pool_nr_running(pool), 0);
}
@@ -3571,12 +3571,11 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
void *hcpu)
{
unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
- struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker_pool *pool;
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
struct worker *worker;
if (pool->nr_workers)
@@ -3594,7 +3593,7 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
case CPU_ONLINE:
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
mutex_lock(&pool->assoc_mutex);
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
@@ -3691,11 +3690,10 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
workqueue_freezing = true;
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
- struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING);
@@ -3781,11 +3779,10 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
goto out_unlock;
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
- struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker_pool *pool;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING));
@@ -3827,11 +3824,10 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
/* initialize gcwqs */
for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
- struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker_pool *pool;
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
- pool->gcwq = gcwq;
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
+ pool->gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
spin_lock_init(&pool->lock);
pool->cpu = cpu;
pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
@@ -3856,10 +3852,9 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
/* create the initial worker */
for_each_online_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
- struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
struct worker_pool *pool;
- for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
+ for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
struct worker *worker;
if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-17 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 1:42 [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 01/17] workqueue: unexport work_cpu() Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 02/17] workqueue: use std_ prefix for the standard per-cpu pools Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 03/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED a pool flag Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 04/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_FREEZING " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 05/17] workqueue: introduce WORK_OFFQ_CPU_NONE Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 06/17] workqueue: add worker_pool->id Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 07/17] workqueue: record pool ID instead of CPU in work->data when off-queue Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 08/17] workqueue: move busy_hash from global_cwq to worker_pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 09/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->cpu " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 10/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->lock " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 11/17] workqueue: make hotplug processing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 12/17] workqueue: make freezing/thawing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 14/17] workqueue: remove worker_pool->gcwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 15/17] workqueue: remove global_cwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-22 6:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23 1:09 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-23 18:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 9:29 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-24 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 16/17] workqueue: rename nr_running variables Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:42 ` [PATCH 17/17] workqueue: post global_cwq removal cleanups Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 1:48 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17 3:25 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-17 19:11 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-22 5:37 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23 1:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 13:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-24 18:51 ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 19:03 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358386969-945-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox