public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_FREEZING a pool flag
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:42:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358386969-945-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358386969-945-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Make GCWQ_FREEZING a pool flag POOL_FREEZING.  This patch doesn't
change locking - FREEZING on both pools of a CPU are set or clear
together while holding gcwq->lock.  It shouldn't cause any functional
difference.

This leaves gcwq->flags w/o any flags.  Removed.

While at it, convert BUG_ON()s in freeze_workqueue_begin() and
thaw_workqueues() to WARN_ON_ONCE().

This is part of an effort to remove global_cwq and make worker_pool
the top level abstraction, which in turn will help implementing worker
pools with user-specified attributes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 8feef7e..6e8bad6 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -47,11 +47,6 @@
 
 enum {
 	/*
-	 * global_cwq flags
-	 */
-	GCWQ_FREEZING		= 1 << 1,	/* freeze in progress */
-
-	/*
 	 * worker_pool flags
 	 *
 	 * A bound pool is either associated or disassociated with its CPU.
@@ -70,6 +65,7 @@ enum {
 	POOL_MANAGE_WORKERS	= 1 << 0,	/* need to manage workers */
 	POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS   = 1 << 1,       /* managing workers */
 	POOL_DISASSOCIATED	= 1 << 2,	/* cpu can't serve workers */
+	POOL_FREEZING		= 1 << 3,	/* freeze in progress */
 
 	/* worker flags */
 	WORKER_STARTED		= 1 << 0,	/* started */
@@ -179,7 +175,6 @@ struct worker_pool {
 struct global_cwq {
 	spinlock_t		lock;		/* the gcwq lock */
 	unsigned int		cpu;		/* I: the associated cpu */
-	unsigned int		flags;		/* L: GCWQ_* flags */
 
 	/* workers are chained either in busy_hash or pool idle_list */
 	DECLARE_HASHTABLE(busy_hash, BUSY_WORKER_HASH_ORDER);
@@ -3389,13 +3384,15 @@ void workqueue_set_max_active(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int max_active)
 	wq->saved_max_active = max_active;
 
 	for_each_cwq_cpu(cpu, wq) {
-		struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
+		struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
+		struct worker_pool *pool = cwq->pool;
+		struct global_cwq *gcwq = pool->gcwq;
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
 		if (!(wq->flags & WQ_FREEZABLE) ||
-		    !(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_FREEZING))
-			cwq_set_max_active(get_cwq(gcwq->cpu, wq), max_active);
+		    !(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING))
+			cwq_set_max_active(cwq, max_active);
 
 		spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 	}
@@ -3685,12 +3682,15 @@ void freeze_workqueues_begin(void)
 
 	for_each_gcwq_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct global_cwq *gcwq = get_gcwq(cpu);
+		struct worker_pool *pool;
 		struct workqueue_struct *wq;
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
-		BUG_ON(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_FREEZING);
-		gcwq->flags |= GCWQ_FREEZING;
+		for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING);
+			pool->flags |= POOL_FREEZING;
+		}
 
 		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 			struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
@@ -3776,8 +3776,10 @@ void thaw_workqueues(void)
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
-		BUG_ON(!(gcwq->flags & GCWQ_FREEZING));
-		gcwq->flags &= ~GCWQ_FREEZING;
+		for_each_worker_pool(pool, gcwq) {
+			WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_FREEZING));
+			pool->flags &= ~POOL_FREEZING;
+		}
 
 		list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
 			struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = get_cwq(cpu, wq);
-- 
1.8.0.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-01-17  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-17  1:42 [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 01/17] workqueue: unexport work_cpu() Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 02/17] workqueue: use std_ prefix for the standard per-cpu pools Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 03/17] workqueue: make GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED a pool flag Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 05/17] workqueue: introduce WORK_OFFQ_CPU_NONE Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 06/17] workqueue: add worker_pool->id Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 07/17] workqueue: record pool ID instead of CPU in work->data when off-queue Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 08/17] workqueue: move busy_hash from global_cwq to worker_pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 09/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->cpu " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 10/17] workqueue: move global_cwq->lock " Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 11/17] workqueue: make hotplug processing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 12/17] workqueue: make freezing/thawing per-pool Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 13/17] workqueue: replace for_each_worker_pool() with for_each_std_worker_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 14/17] workqueue: remove worker_pool->gcwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 15/17] workqueue: remove global_cwq Tejun Heo
2013-01-22  6:50   ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23  1:09     ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-23 18:09   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-01-24  9:29     ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-24 18:44       ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 16/17] workqueue: rename nr_running variables Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:42 ` [PATCH 17/17] workqueue: post global_cwq removal cleanups Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  1:48 ` [PATCHSET] workqueue: remove gcwq and make worker_pool the only backend abstraction Tejun Heo
2013-01-17  3:25 ` Wanlong Gao
2013-01-17 19:11   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-22  5:37 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-01-23  1:07   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 13:36 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-01-24 18:51   ` Tejun Heo
2013-01-24 19:03 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1358386969-945-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox