From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com,
peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, arjan@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de,
pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de
Cc: vincent.guittot@linaro.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alex.shi@intel.com
Subject: [patch v4 12/18] sched: add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:06:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1358996820-23036-13-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358996820-23036-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
This patch add power aware scheduling in fork/exec/wake. It try to
select cpu from the busiest while still has utilization group. That's
will save power for other groups.
The trade off is adding a power aware statistics collection in group
seeking. But since the collection just happened in power scheduling
eligible condition, the worst case of hackbench testing just drops
about 2% with powersaving/balance policy. No clear change for
performance policy.
I had tried to use rq utilisation in this balancing, but since the
utilisation need much time to accumulate itself(345ms). It's bad for
any burst balancing. So I use instant rq utilisation -- nr_running.
Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 179 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 20363fb..7c7d9db 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3318,25 +3318,189 @@ done:
}
/*
- * sched_balance_self: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
+ * sd_lb_stats - Structure to store the statistics of a sched_domain
+ * during load balancing.
+ */
+struct sd_lb_stats {
+ struct sched_group *busiest; /* Busiest group in this sd */
+ struct sched_group *this; /* Local group in this sd */
+ unsigned long total_load; /* Total load of all groups in sd */
+ unsigned long total_pwr; /* Total power of all groups in sd */
+ unsigned long avg_load; /* Average load across all groups in sd */
+
+ /** Statistics of this group */
+ unsigned long this_load;
+ unsigned long this_load_per_task;
+ unsigned long this_nr_running;
+ unsigned int this_has_capacity;
+ unsigned int this_idle_cpus;
+
+ /* Statistics of the busiest group */
+ unsigned int busiest_idle_cpus;
+ unsigned long max_load;
+ unsigned long busiest_load_per_task;
+ unsigned long busiest_nr_running;
+ unsigned long busiest_group_capacity;
+ unsigned int busiest_has_capacity;
+ unsigned int busiest_group_weight;
+
+ int group_imb; /* Is there imbalance in this sd */
+
+ /* Varibles of power awaring scheduling */
+ unsigned int sd_utils; /* sum utilizations of this domain */
+ unsigned long sd_capacity; /* capacity of this domain */
+ struct sched_group *group_leader; /* Group which relieves group_min */
+ unsigned long min_load_per_task; /* load_per_task in group_min */
+ unsigned int leader_util; /* sum utilizations of group_leader */
+ unsigned int min_util; /* sum utilizations of group_min */
+};
+
+/*
+ * sg_lb_stats - stats of a sched_group required for load_balancing
+ */
+struct sg_lb_stats {
+ unsigned long avg_load; /*Avg load across the CPUs of the group */
+ unsigned long group_load; /* Total load over the CPUs of the group */
+ unsigned long sum_nr_running; /* Nr tasks running in the group */
+ unsigned long sum_weighted_load; /* Weighted load of group's tasks */
+ unsigned long group_capacity;
+ unsigned long idle_cpus;
+ unsigned long group_weight;
+ int group_imb; /* Is there an imbalance in the group ? */
+ int group_has_capacity; /* Is there extra capacity in the group? */
+ unsigned int group_utils; /* sum utilizations of group */
+
+ unsigned long sum_shared_running; /* 0 on non-NUMA */
+};
+
+static inline int
+fix_small_capacity(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_group *group);
+
+/*
+ * Try to collect the task running number and capacity of the group.
+ */
+static void get_sg_power_stats(struct sched_group *group,
+ struct sched_domain *sd, struct sg_lb_stats *sgs)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(group)) {
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(i);
+
+ sgs->group_utils += rq->nr_running;
+ }
+
+ sgs->group_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(group->sgp->power,
+ SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
+ if (!sgs->group_capacity)
+ sgs->group_capacity = fix_small_capacity(sd, group);
+ sgs->group_weight = group->group_weight;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Try to collect the task running number and capacity of the doamin.
+ */
+static void get_sd_power_stats(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ struct sched_group *group;
+ struct sg_lb_stats sgs;
+ int sd_min_delta = INT_MAX;
+ int cpu = task_cpu(p);
+
+ group = sd->groups;
+ do {
+ long g_delta;
+ unsigned long threshold;
+
+ if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_group_mask(group)))
+ continue;
+
+ memset(&sgs, 0, sizeof(sgs));
+ get_sg_power_stats(group, sd, &sgs);
+
+ if (sched_policy == SCHED_POLICY_POWERSAVING)
+ threshold = sgs.group_weight;
+ else
+ threshold = sgs.group_capacity;
+
+ g_delta = threshold - sgs.group_utils;
+
+ if (g_delta > 0 && g_delta < sd_min_delta) {
+ sd_min_delta = g_delta;
+ sds->group_leader = group;
+ }
+
+ sds->sd_utils += sgs.group_utils;
+ sds->total_pwr += group->sgp->power;
+ } while (group = group->next, group != sd->groups);
+
+ sds->sd_capacity = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(sds->total_pwr,
+ SCHED_POWER_SCALE);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Execute power policy if this domain is not full.
+ */
+static inline int get_sd_sched_policy(struct sched_domain *sd,
+ int cpu, struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ unsigned long threshold;
+
+ if (sched_policy == SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE)
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+
+ memset(sds, 0, sizeof(*sds));
+ get_sd_power_stats(sd, p, sds);
+
+ if (sched_policy == SCHED_POLICY_POWERSAVING)
+ threshold = sd->span_weight;
+ else
+ threshold = sds->sd_capacity;
+
+ /* still can hold one more task in this domain */
+ if (sds->sd_utils < threshold)
+ return sched_policy;
+
+ return SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE;
+}
+
+/*
+ * If power policy is eligible for this domain, and it has task allowed cpu.
+ * we will select CPU from this domain.
+ */
+static int get_cpu_for_power_policy(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu,
+ struct task_struct *p, struct sd_lb_stats *sds)
+{
+ int policy;
+ int new_cpu = -1;
+
+ policy = get_sd_sched_policy(sd, cpu, p, sds);
+ if (policy != SCHED_POLICY_PERFORMANCE && sds->group_leader)
+ new_cpu = find_idlest_cpu(sds->group_leader, p, cpu);
+
+ return new_cpu;
+}
+
+/*
+ * select_task_rq_fair: balance the current task (running on cpu) in domains
* that have the 'flag' flag set. In practice, this is SD_BALANCE_FORK and
* SD_BALANCE_EXEC.
*
- * Balance, ie. select the least loaded group.
- *
* Returns the target CPU number, or the same CPU if no balancing is needed.
*
* preempt must be disabled.
*/
static int
-select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
+select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int flags)
{
struct sched_domain *tmp, *affine_sd = NULL, *sd = NULL;
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
int new_cpu = cpu;
int want_affine = 0;
- int sync = wake_flags & WF_SYNC;
+ int sync = flags & WF_SYNC;
+ struct sd_lb_stats sds;
if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
return prev_cpu;
@@ -3362,11 +3526,20 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
break;
}
- if (tmp->flags & sd_flag)
+ if (tmp->flags & sd_flag) {
sd = tmp;
+
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
+ }
}
if (affine_sd) {
+ new_cpu = get_cpu_for_power_policy(affine_sd, cpu, p, &sds);
+ if (new_cpu != -1)
+ goto unlock;
+
if (cpu != prev_cpu && wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
prev_cpu = cpu;
@@ -4167,51 +4340,6 @@ static unsigned long task_h_load(struct task_struct *p)
#endif
/********** Helpers for find_busiest_group ************************/
-/*
- * sd_lb_stats - Structure to store the statistics of a sched_domain
- * during load balancing.
- */
-struct sd_lb_stats {
- struct sched_group *busiest; /* Busiest group in this sd */
- struct sched_group *this; /* Local group in this sd */
- unsigned long total_load; /* Total load of all groups in sd */
- unsigned long total_pwr; /* Total power of all groups in sd */
- unsigned long avg_load; /* Average load across all groups in sd */
-
- /** Statistics of this group */
- unsigned long this_load;
- unsigned long this_load_per_task;
- unsigned long this_nr_running;
- unsigned long this_has_capacity;
- unsigned int this_idle_cpus;
-
- /* Statistics of the busiest group */
- unsigned int busiest_idle_cpus;
- unsigned long max_load;
- unsigned long busiest_load_per_task;
- unsigned long busiest_nr_running;
- unsigned long busiest_group_capacity;
- unsigned long busiest_has_capacity;
- unsigned int busiest_group_weight;
-
- int group_imb; /* Is there imbalance in this sd */
-};
-
-/*
- * sg_lb_stats - stats of a sched_group required for load_balancing
- */
-struct sg_lb_stats {
- unsigned long avg_load; /*Avg load across the CPUs of the group */
- unsigned long group_load; /* Total load over the CPUs of the group */
- unsigned long sum_nr_running; /* Nr tasks running in the group */
- unsigned long sum_weighted_load; /* Weighted load of group's tasks */
- unsigned long group_capacity;
- unsigned long idle_cpus;
- unsigned long group_weight;
- int group_imb; /* Is there an imbalance in the group ? */
- int group_has_capacity; /* Is there extra capacity in the group? */
-};
-
/**
* get_sd_load_idx - Obtain the load index for a given sched domain.
* @sd: The sched_domain whose load_idx is to be obtained.
--
1.7.12
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-24 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-24 3:06 [patch v4 0/18] sched: simplified fork, release load avg and power awareness scheduling Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 01/18] sched: set SD_PREFER_SIBLING on MC domain to reduce a domain level Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-13 13:22 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-15 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-16 5:16 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-13 14:17 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 02/18] sched: select_task_rq_fair clean up Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-13 14:44 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 03/18] sched: fix find_idlest_group mess logical Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-13 15:07 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 04/18] sched: don't need go to smaller sched domain Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 05/18] sched: quicker balancing on fork/exec/wake Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-14 3:13 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-14 8:12 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-14 14:08 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-15 13:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 06/18] sched: give initial value for runnable avg of sched entities Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 07/18] sched: set initial load avg of new forked task Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-13 15:14 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-13 15:41 ` Paul Turner
2013-02-14 13:07 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-19 11:34 ` Paul Turner
2013-02-20 4:18 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-02-20 5:13 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 08/18] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-13 15:23 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-13 15:45 ` Paul Turner
2013-02-14 3:07 ` Preeti U Murthy
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 09/18] sched: add sched_policies in kernel Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-13 15:41 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 10/18] sched: add sysfs interface for sched_policy selection Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 11/18] sched: log the cpu utilization at rq Alex Shi
2013-02-12 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-02-14 3:10 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 13/18] sched: packing small tasks in wake/exec balancing Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 14/18] sched: add power/performance balance allowed flag Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 15/18] sched: pull all tasks from source group Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 16/18] sched: don't care if the local group has capacity Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:06 ` [patch v4 17/18] sched: power aware load balance, Alex Shi
2013-01-24 3:07 ` [patch v4 18/18] sched: lazy power balance Alex Shi
2013-01-24 9:44 ` [patch v4 0/18] sched: simplified fork, release load avg and power awareness scheduling Borislav Petkov
2013-01-24 15:07 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-27 2:41 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-27 4:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-27 10:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-27 13:25 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-27 15:51 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 5:17 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 5:51 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-28 6:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 6:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 7:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-29 1:17 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-28 9:55 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-28 10:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 11:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-28 11:32 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 11:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 15:22 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-28 15:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-29 1:38 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-29 1:32 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-29 1:36 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-28 15:47 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-29 1:45 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-29 4:03 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-29 2:27 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-27 10:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-01-27 14:03 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-28 5:19 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-28 6:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-28 7:17 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-28 7:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-01-29 6:02 ` Alex Shi
2013-01-28 1:28 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-04 1:35 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-04 11:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-02-05 2:26 ` Alex Shi
2013-02-06 5:08 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1358996820-23036-13-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).