Re: [patch v1 2/5] regulator: da9055 change irq state to default

[Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com>]

On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 00:03 +0800, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:05:12PM +0530, Ashish Jangam wrote:
> 
> > > What makes you say that there is a dependency here?  It's really not at
> > > all obvious why a change to the primary IRQ signalling mechanism would
> > > affect the internal interrupts of the device.
> 
> > Yes, functionally this dependency should not matter.However, if
> > mfd/primary irq state is low and its components are high then it shall
> > not look good. Therefore the term dependency was used, probably I should
> > have written it in a different manner.
> 
> This logic doesn't follow terribly directly - looking at what you've
> posted it in fact seems that the trigger type is irrelevant in the
> function drivers?
Though it is functionally irrelevant but in the code setting the primary
irq to low and functional driver to high may confuse the code reader.
However I leave this decision to you.