linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: paulus@samba.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net, penberg@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] liblockdep: public headers for rwlock implementation
Date: Fri,  1 Feb 2013 11:47:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359737231-26127-4-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359737231-26127-1-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com>

Both pthreads and lockdep support dealing with rwlocks, so here's the
liblockdep implementation for those.

Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
---
 tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h

diff --git a/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h b/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..26f9a68
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/lib/lockdep/include/liblockdep/rwlock.h
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
+#ifndef _LIBLOCKDEP_RWLOCK_H
+#define _LIBLOCKDEP_RWLOCK_H
+
+#ifdef __USE_LIBLOCKDEP
+
+#include <pthread.h>
+#include "common.h"
+
+struct liblockdep_pthread_rwlock {
+	pthread_rwlock_t rwlock;
+	struct lockdep_map dep_map;
+};
+
+typedef struct liblockdep_pthread_rwlock liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t;
+
+#define LIBLOCKDEP_PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER(rwl)			\
+		(struct liblockdep_pthread_rwlock) {			\
+	.rwlock = PTHREAD_RWLOCK_INITIALIZER,				\
+	.dep_map = STATIC_LOCKDEP_MAP_INIT(#rwl, &((&(rwl))->dep_map)),	\
+}
+
+static inline int __rwlock_init(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock,
+				const char *name,
+				struct lock_class_key *key,
+				const pthread_rwlockattr_t *attr)
+{
+	lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
+
+	return pthread_rwlock_init(&lock->rwlock, attr);
+}
+
+#define liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_init(lock, attr)		\
+({							\
+	static struct lock_class_key __key;		\
+							\
+	__rwlock_init((lock), #lock, &__key, (attr));	\
+})
+
+static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_rdlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+	void *ip = _THIS_IP_;
+	lock_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, 2, 2, NULL, (unsigned long)ip);
+	return pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&lock->rwlock);
+
+}
+
+static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_unlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+	void *ip = _THIS_IP_;
+	lock_release(&lock->dep_map, 0, (unsigned long)ip);
+	return pthread_rwlock_unlock(&lock->rwlock);
+}
+
+static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_wrlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+	void *ip = _THIS_IP_;
+	lock_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 0, 0, 2, NULL, (unsigned long)ip);
+	return pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&lock->rwlock);
+}
+
+static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+	void *ip = _THIS_IP_;
+	lock_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, 2, 2, NULL, (unsigned long)ip);
+	return pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static inline int liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+	void *ip = _THIS_IP_;
+	lock_acquire(&lock->dep_map, 0, 1, 0, 2, NULL, (unsigned long)ip);
+	return pthread_rwlock_trywlock(&lock->rwlock) == 0 ? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static inline int liblockdep_rwlock_destroy(liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t *lock)
+{
+	return pthread_rwlock_destroy(&lock->rwlock);
+}
+
+#define pthread_rwlock_t		liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_t
+#define pthread_rwlock_init		liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_init
+#define pthread_rwlock_rdlock		liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_rdlock
+#define pthread_rwlock_unlock		liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_unlock
+#define pthread_rwlock_wrlock		liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_wrlock
+#define pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock	liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_tryrdlock
+#define pthread_rwlock_trywlock		liblockdep_pthread_rwlock_trywlock
+#define pthread_rwlock_destroy		liblockdep_rwlock_destroy
+
+#endif
+
+#endif
-- 
1.8.1.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-01 16:47 [PATCH v2 1/7] liblockdep: wrap kernel/lockdep.c to allow usage from userspace Sasha Levin
2013-02-01 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] liblockdep: public headers for mutex implementation Sasha Levin
2013-02-01 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] liblockdep: mutex test suite Sasha Levin
2013-02-01 16:47 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2013-02-01 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] liblockdep: rwlock " Sasha Levin
2013-02-01 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] liblockdep: add a MAINTAINERS entry Sasha Levin
2013-02-01 16:47 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] perf: integrate liblockdep support into perf Sasha Levin
2013-02-03 11:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] liblockdep: wrap kernel/lockdep.c to allow usage from userspace Ingo Molnar
2013-02-03 16:19   ` Sasha Levin
2013-02-03 19:10     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359737231-26127-4-git-send-email-sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --to=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).