public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Mark Einon <mark.einon@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: Fix ohci free_irq() warning
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:09:48 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1359752988.22968.16.camel@thor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANK3SE25kcgSu2dwKtQKU6-wvryC4qNQJu_nj3NPJHQTTC0oXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 19:13 +0000, Mark Einon wrote:
> On 31 January 2013 15:04, Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> wrote:
> > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Mark Einon wrote:
> >
> >> >> > >> This patch fixes the kernel warning generated when putting an MSI MS-1727
> >> >> > >> GT740 laptop into suspend mode. The call sequence in this case calls
> >> >> > >> free_irq() twice, once in pci_remove() and once then in pci_suspend().
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > You mean /first/ in pci_suspend() and /then/ in pci_remove() on the
> >> >> > > already suspended devices, right?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yes, I did. The call sequence is suspend then resume. My bad.
> >> >
> >> > Why does the pci_suspend routine call free_irq() at all?  As far as I
> >> > know, it's not supposed to do that.  Won't the device continue to use
> >> > the same IRQ after it is resumed?
> >>
> >> This sounds reasonable to me - I think we could probably get rid of
> >> the request_irq() call from resume, and use
> >> disable_irq()/enable_irq()?
> >
> > Why mess around with IRQ settings at all?  Just have the suspend
> > routine tell the controller to stop generating them.
> >
> > Alan Stern
> >
> 
> I looked into doing this; using context_stop() to stop the controller running.
> 
> However, removing the enable_irq() from pci_resume() involves not
> calling ohci_enable() (as it is also the fw_card_driver.enable
> function, and can't easily be modified). As this call involves a lot
> of register writes and I have no devices to test, I decided against
> it.
> 
> I'll send an updated patch for consideration that merely uses a bool
> to stop the irq being freed twice - crude, but it works without
> changing too much code.

Hi Mark,

I think what Alan means is that the suspend/resume code should just
mask/unmask interrupts at the OHCI controller, via the OHCI
IntEventClear/Set registers (naturally, saving the current mask and
restoring it on resume).

Of course, there's a lot more to do with an OHCI controller -- as you
note. Like stopping running DMA contexts :)  And restarting them on
resume.

I'd do it, but I'm buried to my eyeballs in tty right now -- not fun. I
can _eventually_ do this as I need to address problems with the FW643
anyway at some point, but it's going to be a little while.

In the meantime, I'm a little confused: you say you can't test this code
because you have no hardware; but then how'd you trip this bug?

Regards,
Peter Hurley


  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-28 22:09 [PATCH] firewire: Fix ohci free_irq() warning Mark Einon
2013-01-28 23:01 ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-29 12:44   ` Mark Einon
2013-01-29 16:04     ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-29 17:01       ` Alan Stern
2013-01-30 23:45         ` Mark Einon
2013-01-31 15:04           ` Alan Stern
2013-02-01 19:13             ` Mark Einon
2013-02-01 21:09               ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-02-01 21:14                 ` Peter Hurley
2013-02-01 23:00                 ` Mark Einon
2013-02-02 15:01                   ` Stefan Richter
2013-02-02 15:16                     ` Alan Stern
2013-02-02 15:30                       ` Stefan Richter
2013-01-30 23:43       ` Mark Einon
2013-02-02 14:24         ` Stefan Richter
2013-02-02 15:21           ` Alan Stern
2013-01-29  2:15 ` Greg KH
2013-02-01 19:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Mark Einon
2013-02-05 10:58   ` [PATCH v3] " Mark Einon
2013-02-17  8:41     ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1359752988.22968.16.camel@thor.lan \
    --to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=mark.einon@gmail.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox