public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_irq_remapping: Clean up x2apic optout security warning mess
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 12:04:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360004651.11144.511.camel@bling.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2011b943a886fd7c46079eb10bc24fc130587503.1359759303.git.luto@amacapital.net>

On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 14:57 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Current kernels print this on my Dell server:
> 
>    ------------[ cut here ]------------
>    WARNING: at drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c:542
>    intel_enable_irq_remapping+0x7b/0x27e()
>    Hardware name: PowerEdge R620
>    Your BIOS is broken and requested that x2apic be disabled
>    This will leave your machine vulnerable to irq-injection attacks
>    Use 'intremap=no_x2apic_optout' to override BIOS request
>    [...]
>    Enabled IRQ remapping in xapic mode
>    x2apic not enabled, IRQ remapping is in xapic mode
> 
> This is inconsistent with itself -- interrupt remapping is *on*.
> 
> Fix the mess by making the warnings say what they mean and my making
> sure that compatibility format interrupts (the dangerous ones) are
> disabled if x2apic is present regardless of BIOS settings.
> 
> With this patch applied, the output is:
> 
>   Your BIOS is broken and requested that x2apic be disabled.
>   This will slightly decrease performance.
>   Use 'intremap=no_x2apic_optout' to override BIOS request.
>   Enabled IRQ remapping in xapic mode
>   x2apic not enabled, IRQ remapping is in xapic mode
> 
> This should make us as or more secure than we are now and replace
> a rather scary warning with a much less scary warning on silly
> but functional systems.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> index af8904d..eca8832 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel_irq_remapping.c
> @@ -425,11 +425,22 @@ static void iommu_set_irq_remapping(struct intel_iommu *iommu, int mode)
>  
>  	/* Enable interrupt-remapping */
>  	iommu->gcmd |= DMA_GCMD_IRE;
> +	iommu->gcmd &= ~DMA_GCMD_CFI;  /* Block compatibility-format MSIs */
>  	writel(iommu->gcmd, iommu->reg + DMAR_GCMD_REG);
>  
>  	IOMMU_WAIT_OP(iommu, DMAR_GSTS_REG,
>  		      readl, (sts & DMA_GSTS_IRES), sts);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * With CFI clear in the Global Command register, we should be
> +	 * protected from dangerous (i.e. compatibility) interrupts
> +	 * regardless of x2apic status.  Check just to be sure.
> +	 */
> +	if (sts & DMA_GSTS_CFIS)
> +		WARN(1, KERN_WARNING
> +			"Compatibility-format IRQs enabled despite intr remapping;\n"
> +			"you are vulnerable to IRQ injection.\n");
> +
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->register_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> @@ -526,20 +537,24 @@ static int __init intel_irq_remapping_supported(void)
>  static int __init intel_enable_irq_remapping(void)
>  {
>  	struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
> +	bool x2apic_present;
>  	int setup = 0;
>  	int eim = 0;
>  
> +	x2apic_present = x2apic_supported();
> +
>  	if (parse_ioapics_under_ir() != 1) {
>  		printk(KERN_INFO "Not enable interrupt remapping\n");
> -		return -1;
> +		goto error;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (x2apic_supported()) {
> +	if (x2apic_present) {
>  		eim = !dmar_x2apic_optout();
> -		WARN(!eim, KERN_WARNING
> -			   "Your BIOS is broken and requested that x2apic be disabled\n"
> -			   "This will leave your machine vulnerable to irq-injection attacks\n"
> -			   "Use 'intremap=no_x2apic_optout' to override BIOS request\n");
> +		if (!eim)
> +			printk(KERN_WARNING
> +				"Your BIOS is broken and requested that x2apic be disabled.\n"
> +				"This will slightly decrease performance.\n"
> +				"Use 'intremap=no_x2apic_optout' to override BIOS request.\n");
>  	}
>  
>  	for_each_drhd_unit(drhd) {
> @@ -578,7 +593,7 @@ static int __init intel_enable_irq_remapping(void)
>  		if (eim && !ecap_eim_support(iommu->ecap)) {
>  			printk(KERN_INFO "DRHD %Lx: EIM not supported by DRHD, "
>  			       " ecap %Lx\n", drhd->reg_base_addr, iommu->ecap);
> -			return -1;
> +			goto error;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -594,7 +609,7 @@ static int __init intel_enable_irq_remapping(void)
>  			printk(KERN_ERR "DRHD %Lx: failed to enable queued, "
>  			       " invalidation, ecap %Lx, ret %d\n",
>  			       drhd->reg_base_addr, iommu->ecap, ret);
> -			return -1;
> +			goto error;
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> @@ -625,6 +640,11 @@ error:
>  	/*
>  	 * handle error condition gracefully here!
>  	 */
> +
> +	if (x2apic_present)
> +		WARN(1, KERN_WARNING
> +			"Failed to enable irq remapping.  You are vulnerable to irq-injection attacks.\n");

How so?  Without interrupt remapping, neither KVM assignment or vfio
work unless the user explicitly opts-in to insecure interrupts via
module options.  Are there other attack vectors?  Also, I really like
the code above that forces CFI clear, but I don't think that warning is
correct yet.  According to the paper the vulnerability is enabled if
both x2apic is not enabled and CFI is enabled.  When x2apic is enabled,
does it matter if CFI is enabled?  My understand is no.  Should a
warning only occur if the interrupt remapper is enabled and x2apic is
not enabled and we're not able to clear CFI?  Thanks,

Alex


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-04 19:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-31 16:40 [PATCH] x86, x2apic: Only WARN on broken BIOSes inside a virtual guest Don Zickus
2013-01-31 18:52 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-01-31 19:34   ` Don Zickus
2013-01-31 20:00     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-01-31 20:52       ` Alex Williamson
2013-02-01 22:00         ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-02-01 22:57           ` [PATCH] intel_irq_remapping: Clean up x2apic optout security warning mess Andy Lutomirski
2013-02-03 19:29             ` [tip:x86/apic] x86/intel/irq_remapping: Clean up x2apic opt-out " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2013-02-04 18:20             ` [PATCH] intel_irq_remapping: Clean up x2apic optout " Don Zickus
2013-02-04 19:04             ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2013-02-04 19:19               ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-02-04 19:39                 ` Alex Williamson
2013-02-04 19:47                   ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1360004651.11144.511.camel@bling.home \
    --to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox