public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, alan@linux.intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] TTY: switch tty_schedule_flip
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 09:06:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360073199.3354.48.camel@thor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5110EF95.4060402@suse.cz>

On Tue, 2013-02-05 at 12:40 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 09:39 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-02-01 at 16:06 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> On 02/01/2013 01:37 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 15:53 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >>>> Now, we start converting tty buffer functions to actually use
> >>>> tty_port. This will allow us to get rid of the need of tty in many
> >>>> call sites. Only tty_port will needed and hence no more
> >>>> tty_port_tty_get in those paths.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is the last one: tty_schedule_flip
> >>>
> >>> [snip]
> >>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> >>>> index 5aace4d..a9af1b9a 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/keyboard.c
> >>>> @@ -307,26 +307,17 @@ int kbd_rate(struct kbd_repeat *rep)
> >>>>   */
> >>>>  static void put_queue(struct vc_data *vc, int ch)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> -	struct tty_struct *tty = vc->port.tty;
> >>>> -
> >>>>  	tty_insert_flip_char(&vc->port, ch, 0);
> >>>> -	if (tty) {
> >>>> -		tty_schedule_flip(tty);
> >>>> -	}
> >>>> +	tty_schedule_flip(&vc->port);
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static void puts_queue(struct vc_data *vc, char *cp)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> -	struct tty_struct *tty = vc->port.tty;
> >>>> -
> >>>> -	if (!tty)
> >>>> -		return;
> >>>> -
> >>>>  	while (*cp) {
> >>>>  		tty_insert_flip_char(&vc->port, *cp, 0);
> >>>>  		cp++;
> >>>>  	}
> >>>> -	tty_schedule_flip(tty);
> >>>> +	tty_schedule_flip(&vc->port);
> >>>>  }
> >>>
> >>> Umm. So even though the vt driver knows the tty has been shutdown,
> >>> keystrokes will still be buffered? And then fed to whichever tty happens
> >>> to next get installed on the same port?
> >>
> >> Unless I completely missed something, they should be flushed. If that's
> >> not the case, that's a bug. I will check next week.
> > 
> > Ok.
> > 
> > I'm fairly sure this is happening. Try repeatedly tapping arrow-down
> > while booting (I suggest a VM) and you won't be able to login at tty1
> > (ie, text mode). Repeatable 1 time in 5 or so.
> 
> I can reproduce... with 3.0! Are you sure this is new and introduced by
> the tty buffers switch?

No, I'm not sure this is new.

> > FWIW, I don't agree that the best way is to flush the flip buffers. Why
> > buffer and then schedule the cpu to do work which we already know it
> > can't do and which we're going to discard anyway?
> 
> Because the drivers needn't care whether there is any tty behind and
> listening. This simplifies and speeds up the paths _a lot_. No spin
> locks, no ttys around, no two code paths etc.

Let's defer this part of the discussion until after everything is
running solid.

> > In any event, since -next is already carrying these patches, and
> > by-design, these patches _expect_ the tty to be NULL, are you going to
> > remove the warning in flush_to_ldisc() or shall I?
> 
> I think I don't understand you here, could you elaborate?

         - CPU 0 -          |          - CPU 1 -
                            |
release_tty()               |
   .                        |
   tty->ops->shutdown()     |
      con_shutdown()        |
      .                     |
      vc->port.tty = NULL;  |
      .                     |
   tty->port->itty = NULL;  |
   .                        | puts_queue()
   .                        |    .
   .                        |    tty_schedule_flip(&vc->port);
   .                        |    .
                            |
                            | flush_to_ldisc() runs & WARNs

If driver i/o paths don't need to worry about the lifetime of the tty,
then why warn when they inevitably schedule work to a dead tty (as
above)?

Also, what ensures that flush_to_ldisc() has a valid tty when obtaining
an ldisc ref?  IOW,

        - CPU 0 -           |          - CPU 1 -
                            |
                            | flush_to_ldisc()
                            |    tty = port->itty;
                            | < scheduled away - IRQ servicing ...
tty->port->itty = NULL;     |    .
...                         |    .
free_tty_struct(tty);       |    .
                            | ... returns from IRQ service >
                            | ldisc = tty_ldisc_ref(tty);

Regards,
Peter Hurley



  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-05 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-03 14:53 [PATCH 00/10] TTY: switch flipping functions to tty_port Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 01/10] TTY: switch tty_buffer_request_room " Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 02/10] TTY: convert more flipping functions Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 03/10] TTY: switch tty_insert_flip_char Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] TTY: switch tty_insert_flip_string Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 05/10] TTY: move low_latency to tty_port Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] TTY: switch tty_flip_buffer_push Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 07/10] TTY: switch tty_schedule_flip Jiri Slaby
2013-02-01 12:37   ` Peter Hurley
2013-02-01 15:06     ` Jiri Slaby
2013-02-01 20:39       ` Peter Hurley
2013-02-05 11:40         ` Jiri Slaby
2013-02-05 14:06           ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] cyclades: push down tty_port_tty_get Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] TTY: synclink, remove unneeded tests Jiri Slaby
2013-01-03 14:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] TTY: nozomi, remove dead code Jiri Slaby
2013-01-16  6:47 ` [PATCH 00/10] TTY: switch flipping functions to tty_port Greg KH
2013-01-16 13:37   ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-16 15:39     ` Greg KH
2013-01-16 15:48       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-16 15:44     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-16 15:59       ` Jiri Slaby
2013-01-16 16:23         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-16 16:42         ` Alan Cox
2013-01-16 16:49           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-01-19  4:52           ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1360073199.3354.48.camel@thor.lan \
    --to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox