From: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] virt_mmio: fix signature checking for BE guests
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:08:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1360768102.4045.107.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1360765538-18097-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 14:25 +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Using readl() to read the magic value and then memcmp() to check it
> fails on BE, as bytes will be the other way around (by virtue of
> the registers to follow the endianess of the guest).
Hm. Interesting. I missed the fact that readl() as a "PCI operation"
will always assume LE values...
> Fix it by encoding the magic as an integer instead of a string.
> So I'm not completely sure this is the right fix,
It seems right, however...
> - Using __raw_readl() instead. Is that a generic enough API?
>
... this implies that either the spec is wrong (as it should say: the
device registers are always LE, in the PCI spirit) or all readl()s & co.
should be replaced with __raw equivalents.
Having said that, does the change make everything else work with a BE
guest? (I assume we're talking about the guest being BE, right? ;-) If
so it means that the host is not following the current spec and it
treats all the registers as LE.
> - Reading the MAGIC register byte by byte. Is that allowed? The spec
> only says it is 32bit wide.
And the spirit of the spec was: _exactly 32bit wide_. It's just simpler
to implement one access width on the host side.
Paweł
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-13 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-13 14:25 [RFC PATCH] virt_mmio: fix signature checking for BE guests Marc Zyngier
2013-02-13 15:08 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
2013-02-13 15:28 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-02-13 15:46 ` Pawel Moll
2013-02-13 16:40 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-02-13 16:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-02-13 17:04 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-02-14 0:22 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-14 10:54 ` [PATCH] virtio-spec: Define virtio-mmio registers as LE Pawel Moll
2013-02-15 3:57 ` Rusty Russell
2013-03-01 10:41 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-01 10:50 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-01 11:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-01 12:37 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-01 13:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-05 0:11 ` Rusty Russell
2013-03-06 15:10 ` Pawel Moll
2013-03-07 6:36 ` Rusty Russell
2013-02-15 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH] virt_mmio: fix signature checking for BE guests Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1360768102.4045.107.camel@hornet \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).