From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756304Ab3BVNtR (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:49:17 -0500 Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:54977 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755061Ab3BVNtN (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:49:13 -0500 Message-ID: <1361540926.26780.56.camel@laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpustat: use atomic operations to read/update stats From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Kevin Hilman , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:48:46 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20130222125019.GC17948@somewhere.redhat.com> References: <1361512604-2720-1-git-send-email-khilman@linaro.org> <1361522767.26780.44.camel@laptop> <20130222125019.GC17948@somewhere.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 13:50 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > atomic64_read() and atomic64_set() are supposed to take care of that, > without > even the need for _inc() or _add() parts that use LOCK. Are you sure? Generally atomic*_set() is not actually an atomic operation.