public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 00:31:05 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362065465.1758.15.camel@leonhard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362046013.4460.195.camel@marge.simpson.net>

2013-02-28 (목), 11:06 +0100, Mike Galbraith:
> On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 18:25 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> 
> > Not sure if it should require bidirectional relationship.  Looks like
> > just for benchmarks.  Isn't there a one-way relationship that could get
> > a benefit from this?  I don't know ;-)
> 
> ??  Meaningful relationships are bare minimum bidirectional, how can you
> describe one connection and have it remain meaningful?  I love "her" is
> unlikely to lead to anything meaningful if "she" doesn't know you exist.

Maybe I misunderstood something.  I was thinking about typical
cooperation models like manager-worker, producer-consumer or pipeline
and thought that they are usually one-way relationship in terms of the
wakeup.

Thanks,
Namhyung



  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-28 15:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-28  6:38 [RFC PATCH] sched: wakeup buddy Michael Wang
2013-02-28  7:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  7:40   ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  7:42     ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  8:06       ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  8:04     ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  8:14       ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  8:24         ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28  8:49           ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  9:18             ` Mike Galbraith
2013-03-01  2:18               ` Michael Wang
2013-02-28  9:25 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-02-28 10:06   ` Mike Galbraith
2013-02-28 15:31     ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2013-03-01  2:30       ` Michael Wang
2013-03-01  2:18   ` Michael Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1362065465.1758.15.camel@leonhard \
    --to=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox