public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LSM List <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: IMA: How to manage user space signing policy with others
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:49:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362102544.9158.35.camel@falcor1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACLa4pum7kXK+7+8ceVSuQsKDCFebdgGVYRTMKH9GQarqCEgMQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 17:20 -0500, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 02:23:39PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> 
> I think just a second for both of you to step back and see a slightly
> larger picture/problem might help.
> 
> This is a weird case where Vivek does not trust root to make the
> policy decision.  If the box is configured for secure boot, it needs
> to make these decisions no matter what the admin wants.  This is why
> he talks about trying to merge multiple competing policies.  The
> current IMA policy is controlled by whomever can first write to the
> ima policy file interface.  Vivek does not want an admin to be able to
> overwrite the secureboot policy.  So I get why he thinks changes may
> be needed to support this use case.

Nobody is saying that changes aren't necessary.

> The ima_tcb policy was meant to be larger than needed to determine a
> trusted computing base, but it is clearly not a superset of what he is
> hoping to accomplish.

The 'ima_tcb' policy is for measurement and attestation.  The policy
being discussed here is the 'ima_appraise_tcb' used for enforcing local
file integrity.

> So how do we take a system where the admin/software has some control
> over the integrity policy (as it is today?) and the kernel/system
> itself also has control (as Vivek wants it)?  

> It seems unsolved with what we have today....

Right, and merging policies won't work.  I see where you're going with
this...

thanks!

Mimi


  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-01  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-28 15:13 IMA: How to manage user space signing policy with others Vivek Goyal
2013-02-28 18:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-28 20:30   ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 20:57     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01  1:42       ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 19:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 20:08   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01  1:45     ` Mimi Zohar
2013-02-28 21:35   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-28 22:20     ` Eric Paris
2013-03-01  1:49       ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2013-03-01 12:15         ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-01 15:28           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01 18:40             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01 19:39               ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-01 21:33                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-03 21:42                   ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-04 15:29                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-04 17:46                       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-04 18:59                       ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-04 19:15                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-05  1:21                           ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-05 15:18                             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-05 20:40                               ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-05 21:53                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-06 15:42                                   ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-06 23:55                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07  1:39                                       ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-07 14:36                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 15:40                                           ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-07 15:53                                             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 17:53                                               ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-03-07 21:56                                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-08  8:09                                                   ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-03-08 15:40                                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-06 15:54                                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-06 22:48                                   ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-06 23:38                                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 13:38                                       ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-07 14:57                                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-04 19:19                         ` Eric Paris
2013-03-04 21:47                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-01  2:17     ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1362102544.9158.35.camel@falcor1 \
    --to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox