public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 16/31] workqueue: introduce workqueue_attrs
Date: Fri,  1 Mar 2013 19:24:07 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362194662-2344-17-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362194662-2344-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Introduce struct workqueue_attrs which carries worker attributes -
currently the nice level and allowed cpumask along with helper
routines alloc_workqueue_attrs() and free_workqueue_attrs().

Each worker_pool now carries ->attrs describing the attributes of its
workers.  All functions dealing with cpumask and nice level of workers
are updated to follow worker_pool->attrs instead of determining them
from other characteristics of the worker_pool, and init_workqueues()
is updated to set worker_pool->attrs appropriately for all standard
pools.

Note that create_worker() is updated to always perform set_user_nice()
and use set_cpus_allowed_ptr() combined with manual assertion of
PF_THREAD_BOUND instead of kthread_bind().  This simplifies handling
random attributes without affecting the outcome.

This patch doesn't introduce any behavior changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h |  12 ++++++
 kernel/workqueue.c        | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 899be66..2683e8e 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -115,6 +115,15 @@ struct delayed_work {
 	int cpu;
 };
 
+/*
+ * A struct for workqueue attributes.  This can be used to change
+ * attributes of an unbound workqueue.
+ */
+struct workqueue_attrs {
+	int			nice;		/* nice level */
+	cpumask_var_t		cpumask;	/* allowed CPUs */
+};
+
 static inline struct delayed_work *to_delayed_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	return container_of(work, struct delayed_work, work);
@@ -399,6 +408,9 @@ __alloc_workqueue_key(const char *fmt, unsigned int flags, int max_active,
 
 extern void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq);
 
+struct workqueue_attrs *alloc_workqueue_attrs(gfp_t gfp_mask);
+void free_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *attrs);
+
 extern bool queue_work_on(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 			struct work_struct *work);
 extern bool queue_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct work_struct *work);
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index f97539b..7eba824 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ struct worker_pool {
 	struct mutex		assoc_mutex;	/* protect POOL_DISASSOCIATED */
 	struct ida		worker_ida;	/* L: for worker IDs */
 
+	struct workqueue_attrs	*attrs;		/* I: worker attributes */
+
 	/*
 	 * The current concurrency level.  As it's likely to be accessed
 	 * from other CPUs during try_to_wake_up(), put it in a separate
@@ -1563,14 +1565,13 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
 		 * against POOL_DISASSOCIATED.
 		 */
 		if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED))
-			set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, get_cpu_mask(pool->cpu));
+			set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, pool->attrs->cpumask);
 
 		spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
 		if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)
 			return false;
 		if (task_cpu(current) == pool->cpu &&
-		    cpumask_equal(&current->cpus_allowed,
-				  get_cpu_mask(pool->cpu)))
+		    cpumask_equal(&current->cpus_allowed, pool->attrs->cpumask))
 			return true;
 		spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
 
@@ -1677,7 +1678,7 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
 		 * wq doesn't really matter but let's keep @worker->pool
 		 * and @pwq->pool consistent for sanity.
 		 */
-		if (std_worker_pool_pri(worker->pool))
+		if (worker->pool->attrs->nice < 0)
 			wq = system_highpri_wq;
 		else
 			wq = system_wq;
@@ -1719,7 +1720,7 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
  */
 static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
-	const char *pri = std_worker_pool_pri(pool) ? "H" : "";
+	const char *pri = pool->attrs->nice < 0  ? "H" : "";
 	struct worker *worker = NULL;
 	int id = -1;
 
@@ -1749,24 +1750,23 @@ static struct worker *create_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	if (IS_ERR(worker->task))
 		goto fail;
 
-	if (std_worker_pool_pri(pool))
-		set_user_nice(worker->task, HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL);
+	set_user_nice(worker->task, pool->attrs->nice);
+	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
 
 	/*
-	 * Determine CPU binding of the new worker depending on
-	 * %POOL_DISASSOCIATED.  The caller is responsible for ensuring the
-	 * flag remains stable across this function.  See the comments
-	 * above the flag definition for details.
-	 *
-	 * As an unbound worker may later become a regular one if CPU comes
-	 * online, make sure every worker has %PF_THREAD_BOUND set.
+	 * %PF_THREAD_BOUND is used to prevent userland from meddling with
+	 * cpumask of workqueue workers.  This is an abuse.  We need
+	 * %PF_KERNEL_CPUMASK.
 	 */
-	if (!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)) {
-		kthread_bind(worker->task, pool->cpu);
-	} else {
-		worker->task->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
+	worker->task->flags |= PF_THREAD_BOUND;
+
+	/*
+	 * The caller is responsible for ensuring %POOL_DISASSOCIATED
+	 * remains stable across this function.  See the comments above the
+	 * flag definition for details.
+	 */
+	if (pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED)
 		worker->flags |= WORKER_UNBOUND;
-	}
 
 	return worker;
 fail:
@@ -3121,7 +3121,52 @@ int keventd_up(void)
 	return system_wq != NULL;
 }
 
-static void init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
+/**
+ * free_workqueue_attrs - free a workqueue_attrs
+ * @attrs: workqueue_attrs to free
+ *
+ * Undo alloc_workqueue_attrs().
+ */
+void free_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+{
+	if (attrs) {
+		free_cpumask_var(attrs->cpumask);
+		kfree(attrs);
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * alloc_workqueue_attrs - allocate a workqueue_attrs
+ * @gfp_mask: allocation mask to use
+ *
+ * Allocate a new workqueue_attrs, initialize with default settings and
+ * return it.  Returns NULL on failure.
+ */
+struct workqueue_attrs *alloc_workqueue_attrs(gfp_t gfp_mask)
+{
+	struct workqueue_attrs *attrs;
+
+	attrs = kzalloc(sizeof(*attrs), gfp_mask);
+	if (!attrs)
+		goto fail;
+	if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&attrs->cpumask, gfp_mask))
+		goto fail;
+
+	cpumask_setall(attrs->cpumask);
+	return attrs;
+fail:
+	free_workqueue_attrs(attrs);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * init_worker_pool - initialize a newly zalloc'd worker_pool
+ * @pool: worker_pool to initialize
+ *
+ * Initiailize a newly zalloc'd @pool.  It also allocates @pool->attrs.
+ * Returns 0 on success, -errno on failure.
+ */
+static int init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
 	spin_lock_init(&pool->lock);
 	pool->flags |= POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
@@ -3139,6 +3184,11 @@ static void init_worker_pool(struct worker_pool *pool)
 	mutex_init(&pool->manager_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&pool->assoc_mutex);
 	ida_init(&pool->worker_ida);
+
+	pool->attrs = alloc_workqueue_attrs(GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pool->attrs)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
@@ -3791,7 +3841,8 @@ out_unlock:
 
 static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 {
-	int cpu;
+	int std_nice[NR_STD_WORKER_POOLS] = { 0, HIGHPRI_NICE_LEVEL };
+	int i, cpu;
 
 	/* make sure we have enough bits for OFFQ pool ID */
 	BUILD_BUG_ON((1LU << (BITS_PER_LONG - WORK_OFFQ_POOL_SHIFT)) <
@@ -3808,10 +3859,18 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
 	for_each_wq_cpu(cpu) {
 		struct worker_pool *pool;
 
+		i = 0;
 		for_each_std_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
-			init_worker_pool(pool);
+			BUG_ON(init_worker_pool(pool));
 			pool->cpu = cpu;
 
+			if (cpu != WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)
+				cpumask_copy(pool->attrs->cpumask, cpumask_of(cpu));
+			else
+				cpumask_setall(pool->attrs->cpumask);
+
+			pool->attrs->nice = std_nice[i++];
+
 			/* alloc pool ID */
 			BUG_ON(worker_pool_assign_id(pool));
 		}
-- 
1.8.1.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-02  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-02  3:23 [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10-tmp] workqueue: implement workqueue with custom worker attributes Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 01/31] workqueue: make sanity checks less punshing using WARN_ON[_ONCE]()s Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 02/31] workqueue: make workqueue_lock irq-safe Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 03/31] workqueue: introduce kmem_cache for pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 04/31] workqueue: add workqueue_struct->pwqs list Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 05/31] workqueue: replace for_each_pwq_cpu() with for_each_pwq() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 06/31] workqueue: introduce for_each_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 07/31] workqueue: restructure pool / pool_workqueue iterations in freeze/thaw functions Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 10:09   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-10 12:34     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:23 ` [PATCH 08/31] workqueue: add wokrqueue_struct->maydays list to replace mayday cpu iterators Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 09/31] workqueue: consistently use int for @cpu variables Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 10/31] workqueue: remove workqueue_struct->pool_wq.single Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 11/31] workqueue: replace get_pwq() with explicit per_cpu_ptr() accesses and first_pwq() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 12/31] workqueue: update synchronization rules on workqueue->pwqs Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 10:09   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-10 12:38     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 18:20   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 13/31] workqueue: update synchronization rules on worker_pool_idr Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 18:20   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 14/31] workqueue: replace POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS flag with worker_pool->manager_mutex Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 10:09   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-10 12:46     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 18:19   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 15/31] workqueue: separate out init_worker_pool() from init_workqueues() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-04 18:37   ` [PATCH v2 16/31] workqueue: introduce workqueue_attrs Tejun Heo
2013-03-05 22:29     ` Ryan Mallon
2013-03-05 22:33       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-05 22:34         ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-05 22:40           ` Ryan Mallon
2013-03-05 22:44             ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-05 23:20               ` Ryan Mallon
2013-03-05 23:28                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 17/31] workqueue: implement attribute-based unbound worker_pool management Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 10:08   ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-10 12:58     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 18:36       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 18:21   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 18/31] workqueue: remove unbound_std_worker_pools[] and related helpers Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 19/31] workqueue: drop "std" from cpu_std_worker_pools and for_each_std_worker_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 20/31] workqueue: add pool ID to the names of unbound kworkers Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 21/31] workqueue: drop WQ_RESCUER and test workqueue->rescuer for NULL instead Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 22/31] workqueue: restructure __alloc_workqueue_key() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 23/31] workqueue: implement get/put_pwq() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 24/31] workqueue: prepare flush_workqueue() for dynamic creation and destrucion of unbound pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 25/31] workqueue: perform non-reentrancy test when queueing to unbound workqueues too Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 26/31] workqueue: implement apply_workqueue_attrs() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 27/31] workqueue: make it clear that WQ_DRAINING is an internal flag Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 28/31] workqueue: reject increasing max_active for ordered workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-04 18:30   ` [PATCH UPDATED 28/31] workqueue: reject adjusting max_active or applying attrs to " Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 29/31] cpumask: implement cpumask_parse() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 30/31] driver/base: implement subsys_virtual_register() Tejun Heo
2013-03-02 18:17   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-02 20:26     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-03  6:42     ` Kay Sievers
2013-03-05 20:43       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-07 23:31         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-08  0:04           ` Kay Sievers
2013-03-10 11:57             ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 16:45               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-10 17:00                 ` Kay Sievers
2013-03-10 17:24                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-03-10 17:50                     ` Kay Sievers
2013-03-10 18:34                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 18:40                         ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-02  3:24 ` [PATCH 31/31] workqueue: implement sysfs interface for workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-04 18:30   ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-05 20:41 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10-tmp] workqueue: implement workqueue with custom worker attributes Tejun Heo
2013-03-10 10:34 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-10 12:01   ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-11 15:24     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-11 15:40       ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-11 15:42     ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-11 15:43       ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 18:10     ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-12 18:34 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1362194662-2344-17-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox