From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ima: Return INTEGRITY_FAIL if digital signature can't be verified
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 08:54:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362491644.4392.161.camel@falcor1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362490253.4392.159.camel@falcor1>
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 08:30 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Digital signature verification happens using integrity_digsig_verify().
> If a digital signature is present in security.ima, then any error, which
> happens during signature verification, should lead to status
> INTEGRITY_FAIL. In the future we might want to differentiate between
> persistent (eg. -ENOMEM) vs. non-persistent errors, in order to cache
> failures. This patch removes the unnecessary -EOPNOTSUPP test.
correction, "persistent vs. non-persistent(eg. -ENOMEM)"
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 19:55 [RFC PATCH 0/6][v3] ima: Support a mode to appraise signed files only Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 19:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] ima: detect security xattrs not enabled Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 19:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] ima: Return INTEGRITY_FAIL if digital signature can't be verified Vivek Goyal
2013-03-04 13:48 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-04 16:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-05 13:30 ` Mimi Zohar
2013-03-05 13:54 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2013-03-05 15:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 19:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] ima/evm: Differentiate between ima/evm nolabel return code Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 19:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] ima: Introduce new integrity error code INTEGRITY_XATTR_NOTSUPP Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 19:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] ima: Allow appraisal of digitally signed files only Vivek Goyal
2013-03-05 19:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-03-07 7:44 ` Kasatkin, Dmitry
2013-02-14 19:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] ima: With appraise_type=optional, audit log some messages as info Vivek Goyal
2013-02-14 20:51 ` [RFC PATCH 0/6][v3] ima: Support a mode to appraise signed files only Mimi Zohar
2013-02-14 21:44 ` Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362491644.4392.161.camel@falcor1 \
--to=zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox