From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>,
Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@gmail.com>,
"Vinod, Chegu" <chegu_vinod@hp.com>,
"Low, Jason" <jason.low2@hp.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
aquini@redhat.com, Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Larry Woodman <lwoodman@redhat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
chris.mason@fusionio.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] ipc: reduce ipc lock contention
Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 09:45:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362645933.2606.14.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51365B66.5010905@redhat.com>
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 15:53 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Indeed. Though how well my patches will work with Oracle will
> depend a lot on what kind of semctl syscalls they are doing.
>
> Does Oracle typically do one semop per semctl syscall, or does
> it pass in a whole bunch at once?
https://oss.oracle.com/~mason/sembench.c
I think Chris wrote that to match a particular pattern of semaphore
operations the database engine in question does. I haven't checked to
see if it triggers the case in point though.
Also, Chris since left Oracle but maybe he knows who to poke.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-07 8:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-05 9:35 [PATCH v2 0/4] ipc: reduce ipc lock contention Davidlohr Bueso
2013-03-05 15:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-06 7:13 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-03-06 16:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-05 17:10 ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-05 19:42 ` Waiman Long
2013-03-05 20:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-05 20:53 ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-06 3:46 ` Waiman Long
2013-03-06 3:53 ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-06 7:14 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-03-07 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-03-07 12:55 ` Chris Mason
2013-03-07 15:54 ` Dave Kleikamp
2013-03-07 16:42 ` Chris Mason
2013-03-06 22:13 ` [PATCH v2 5/4] ipc: replace ipc_perm.lock with an rwlock Rik van Riel
2013-03-06 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/4] ipc: open code and rename sem_lock Rik van Riel
2013-03-06 22:15 ` [PATCH v2 7/4] ipc: fine grained locking for semtimedop Rik van Riel
2013-03-06 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2013-03-06 23:09 ` Rik van Riel
2013-03-07 1:36 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-03-07 20:55 ` Rik van Riel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362645933.2606.14.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=Waiman.Long@hp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=benisty.e@gmail.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=chris.mason@fusionio.com \
--cc=davidlohr.bueso@hp.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lwoodman@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox