public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 5/5] kernel: make tasklist_lock fair for process context call sites
Date: Thu,  7 Mar 2013 20:37:17 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362717437-1729-6-git-send-email-walken@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362717437-1729-1-git-send-email-walken@google.com>

Split tasklist_lock into two rwlocks: one fair for process context
call sites, one unfair for irq/softirq context call sites.
The write side lockers need to acquire both.

Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>

---
 include/linux/sched.h | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
 kernel/fork.c         |  8 ++++++--
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 4eb58b796261..d2b9bc78e86d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
 #define TASK_COMM_LEN 16
 
 #include <linux/spinlock.h>
+#include <linux/fair_rwlock.h>
 #include <linux/hardirq.h>
 
 /*
@@ -226,44 +227,49 @@ extern char ___assert_task_state[1 - 2*!!(
  * _adding_ to the beginning of the run-queue has
  * a separate lock).
  */
-extern rwlock_t tasklist_lock;
+extern struct tasklist_lock {
+	struct fair_rwlock process;
+	rwlock_t any;
+} tasklist_lock;
 extern spinlock_t mmlist_lock;
 
 static inline void tasklist_write_lock(void)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_serving_softirq() || in_irq() || in_nmi());
-	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	fair_write_lock(&tasklist_lock.process);
+	write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock.any);
 }
 
 static inline void tasklist_write_unlock(void)
 {
-	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
+	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock.any);
+	fair_write_unlock(&tasklist_lock.process);
 }
 
 static inline void tasklist_read_lock(void)
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_serving_softirq() || in_irq() || in_nmi());
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+	fair_read_lock(&tasklist_lock.process);
 }
 
 static inline void tasklist_read_unlock(void)
 {
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+	fair_read_unlock(&tasklist_lock.process);
 }
 
 static inline void tasklist_read_lock_any(void)
 {
-	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
+	read_lock(&tasklist_lock.any);
 }
 
 static inline int tasklist_read_trylock_any(void)
 {
-	return read_trylock(&tasklist_lock);
+	return read_trylock(&tasklist_lock.any);
 }
 
 static inline void tasklist_read_unlock_any(void)
 {
-	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
+	read_unlock(&tasklist_lock.any);
 }
 
 struct task_struct;
diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 827fe2e48e8c..71ab78755859 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -93,12 +93,16 @@ int max_threads;		/* tunable limit on nr_threads */
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, process_counts) = 0;
 
-__cacheline_aligned DEFINE_RWLOCK(tasklist_lock);  /* outer */
+__cacheline_aligned struct tasklist_lock tasklist_lock = {
+	.process = __FAIR_RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(tasklist_lock_process),
+	.any     = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(tasklist_lock_any)
+};
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU
 int lockdep_tasklist_lock_is_held(void)
 {
-	return lockdep_is_held(&tasklist_lock);
+	return lockdep_is_held(&tasklist_lock.process) ||
+		lockdep_is_held(&tasklist_lock.any);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockdep_tasklist_lock_is_held);
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_RCU */
-- 
1.8.1.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-08  4:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-08  4:37 [RFC PATCH 0/5] tasklist_lock fairness issues Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-08  4:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] kernel: add tasklist_{read,write}_lock{,_any} helper functions Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-08  4:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] kernel: use tasklist_read_lock_any() when locking tasklist in irq context Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-08  4:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] kernel: use tasklist_{read,write}_lock() to lock tasklist in process context Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-08  4:37 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] kernel: add ticket based fair rwlock Michel Lespinasse
2013-03-08  4:37 ` Michel Lespinasse [this message]
2013-03-09 18:26 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] tasklist_lock fairness issues Oleg Nesterov
2013-03-10  2:37   ` Michel Lespinasse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1362717437-1729-6-git-send-email-walken@google.com \
    --to=walken@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox