From: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>,
Shawn Starr <shawn.starr@rogers.com>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
USB list <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses)
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2013 09:53:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362819234.1220.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1303082116310.28403-100000@netrider.rowland.org>
Am Freitag, den 08.03.2013, 21:19 -0500 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Fri, 8 Mar 2013, Peter Hurley wrote:
>
> > [ +linux-usb ]
> >
> > On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 14:12 -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > I am noticing since rc0 and now rc1, very poor interrupt handling. Keyboard response, mouse movements, display refreshing etc. General input/display sluggishness. Did something break IRQ handling somewhere? I need to validate if this happens with X not running also if it is i915 related somehow. The behavor is noticed in a console login however.
> > >
> > > Device: Lenovo W500 laptop
> >
> > Hi Shawn,
> >
> > Unhandled interrupts is the problem.
> >
> > Is the device below being id'd properly?
> > If you remove this device, does the problem go away?
>
> Does either of the kernels in question have commit 0f815a0a700b (USB:
> UHCI: fix IRQ race during initialization)? That commit was added to
> fix precisely this sort of thing.
I think so:
$ git describe
v3.9-rc1-211-g47b3bc9
$ git branch --contains 0f815a0a700b
* master
>
> Alan Stern
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-09 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-08 19:12 [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses Shawn Starr
2013-03-08 21:33 ` [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses) Peter Hurley
2013-03-09 2:19 ` Alan Stern
2013-03-09 8:53 ` Thomas Meyer [this message]
2013-03-09 13:07 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-13 21:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-14 14:51 ` Alan Stern
2013-03-14 14:56 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-14 15:18 ` Alan Stern
2013-03-14 15:39 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-14 15:47 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-14 16:10 ` Alan Stern
2013-03-14 16:13 ` Alan Stern
2013-03-14 16:09 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-14 16:42 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-14 16:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-14 17:06 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-14 17:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-14 17:26 ` Peter Hurley
2013-03-15 7:59 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-15 9:20 ` Harald Arnesen
2013-03-15 13:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-15 13:33 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-15 15:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-15 19:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-18 9:12 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-18 18:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-18 22:05 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-18 22:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2013-03-18 19:19 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-18 19:57 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-18 22:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-15 15:32 ` Greg KH
2013-03-15 15:37 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-15 15:47 ` Greg KH
2013-03-15 16:21 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-18 8:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-18 15:56 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: stop using GMBUS IRQs on Gen4 chips (was Re: [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses)) Jiri Kosina
2013-03-18 17:04 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-19 8:56 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-19 9:03 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-18 19:21 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-03-18 11:13 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush writes to GMBUS registers Chris Wilson
2013-03-18 11:51 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-03-18 12:48 ` Chris Wilson
2013-03-14 18:48 ` [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses) Yinghai Lu
2013-03-11 3:38 ` [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-11 10:09 ` Harald Arnesen
2013-03-11 14:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-18 7:14 [3.9-rc1] irq 16: nobody cared (was [3.9-rc1] very poor interrupt responses) Thomas Meyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362819234.1220.1.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=thomas@m3y3r.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=shawn.starr@rogers.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox