From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: Reset detached siblings' group_flags
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:59:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1362995984.14933.0.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1362629990-10053-1-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 13:19 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>
>
> Currently if a group_leader event is deleted, the sibling events are
> upgraded to singleton events of a same group list. At this time, the
> siblings inherit the leader's group_flags.
>
> However, if the group has mixed hw/sw events the leader's group_flag
> does not contain PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE so sibling sw events will miss
> the flag also. Fix it.
>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 5c75791d7269..007dfe846d4d 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -1107,8 +1107,9 @@ static void perf_group_detach(struct perf_event *event)
> list_move_tail(&sibling->group_entry, list);
> sibling->group_leader = sibling;
>
> - /* Inherit group flags from the previous leader */
> - sibling->group_flags = event->group_flags;
> + /* Reset group flags for each siblings */
> + sibling->group_flags = is_software_event(sibling) ?
> + PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE : 0;
> }
In such a case, does the event not continue to live on the hw pmu? That
is, after this patch we'll have a software event on the hardware pmu
list with PERF_GROUP_SOFTWARE set, right? Seems odd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-11 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-07 4:19 [PATCH 1/2] perf: Reset detached siblings' group_flags Namhyung Kim
2013-03-07 4:19 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: Fix mixed hw/sw event group initialization Namhyung Kim
2013-03-11 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-11 11:20 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-03-11 13:10 ` [PATCH] perf tests: Add automated test for mixed type event groups Jiri Olsa
2013-03-11 9:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-03-11 11:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf: Reset detached siblings' group_flags Namhyung Kim
2013-03-11 11:51 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1362995984.14933.0.camel@laptop \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox