From: "Shevchenko, Andriy" <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Koul, Vinod" <vinod.koul@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: A proposal to check the device in generic way
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:32:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363001537.18714.3.camel@smile> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 2028 bytes --]
Hello.
Currently in linux-next we have the following things:
$ git grep -n 'chan->device->dev->driver' drivers/dma/
drivers/dma/amba-pl08x.c:1594: if (chan->device->dev->driver !=
&pl08x_amba_driver.drv)
drivers/dma/dmaengine.c:190: return chan->device->dev->driver->owner;
drivers/dma/edma.c:609: if (chan->device->dev->driver ==
&edma_driver.driver) {
drivers/dma/omap-dma.c:654: if (chan->device->dev->driver ==
&omap_dma_driver.driver) {
drivers/dma/pl330.c:2374: if (chan->device->dev->driver !=
&pl330_driver.drv)
drivers/dma/sa11x0-dma.c:1080: if (chan->device->dev->driver ==
&sa11x0_dma_driver.driver)
I think it's a non-generic way to check which driver provides a channel
into filter function. First of all, I don't get why that comparison goes
as deep as driver structure. Isn't clearer to check chan->device->dev
against the struct dev passed in the custom parameter structure? Like:
struct filter_params {
struct dev *dev;
void *param;
};
bool filter_fn(struct dma_chan *chan, void *fparams)
{
struct filter_params *p = fparams;
if (chan->device->dev != p->dev)
return false;
...
}
In case my idea has a right to live, what about to move such check inside
DMA engine code?
Opinions, comments?
Earlier I tried to discuss this with Arnd here: http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg220716.html
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4
Domiciled in Helsinki
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
ÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next reply other threads:[~2013-03-11 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-11 11:32 Shevchenko, Andriy [this message]
2013-03-11 12:26 ` A proposal to check the device in generic way Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-03-11 12:42 ` Shevchenko, Andriy
2013-03-11 17:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-11 13:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363001537.18714.3.camel@smile \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox