From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] workqueue: factor out initial worker creation into create_and_start_worker()
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 19:57:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363229845-6831-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1363229845-6831-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
get_unbound_pool(), workqueue_cpu_up_callback() and init_workqueues()
have similar code pieces to create and start the initial worker factor
those out into create_and_start_worker().
This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index bc25bdf..cac7106 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1793,6 +1793,26 @@ static void start_worker(struct worker *worker)
}
/**
+ * create_and_start_worker - create and start a worker for a pool
+ * @pool: the target pool
+ *
+ * Create and start a new worker for @pool.
+ */
+static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
+{
+ struct worker *worker;
+
+ worker = create_worker(pool);
+ if (worker) {
+ spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
+ start_worker(worker);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
+ }
+
+ return worker ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+/**
* destroy_worker - destroy a workqueue worker
* @worker: worker to be destroyed
*
@@ -3542,7 +3562,6 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
static DEFINE_MUTEX(create_mutex);
u32 hash = wqattrs_hash(attrs);
struct worker_pool *pool;
- struct worker *worker;
mutex_lock(&create_mutex);
@@ -3568,14 +3587,9 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
goto fail;
/* create and start the initial worker */
- worker = create_worker(pool);
- if (!worker)
+ if (create_and_start_worker(pool) < 0)
goto fail;
- spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
- start_worker(worker);
- spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
-
/* install */
spin_lock_irq(&workqueue_lock);
hash_add(unbound_pool_hash, &pool->hash_node, hash);
@@ -4148,18 +4162,10 @@ static int __cpuinit workqueue_cpu_up_callback(struct notifier_block *nfb,
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
- struct worker *worker;
-
if (pool->nr_workers)
continue;
-
- worker = create_worker(pool);
- if (!worker)
+ if (create_and_start_worker(pool) < 0)
return NOTIFY_BAD;
-
- spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
- start_worker(worker);
- spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
}
break;
@@ -4409,15 +4415,8 @@ static int __init init_workqueues(void)
struct worker_pool *pool;
for_each_cpu_worker_pool(pool, cpu) {
- struct worker *worker;
-
pool->flags &= ~POOL_DISASSOCIATED;
-
- worker = create_worker(pool);
- BUG_ON(!worker);
- spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
- start_worker(worker);
- spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
+ BUG_ON(create_and_start_worker(pool) < 0);
}
}
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-14 2:57 [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: break up workqueue_lock into multiple locks Tejun Heo
2013-03-14 2:57 ` [PATCH 1/7] workqueue: rename worker_pool->assoc_mutex to ->manager_mutex Tejun Heo
2013-03-14 16:00 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-14 16:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-03-14 2:57 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-14 2:57 ` [PATCH 3/7] workqueue: better define locking rules around worker creation / destruction Tejun Heo
2013-03-14 2:57 ` [PATCH 4/7] workqueue: relocate global variable defs and function decls in workqueue.c Tejun Heo
2013-03-14 2:57 ` [PATCH 5/7] workqueue: separate out pool and workqueue locking into wq_mutex Tejun Heo
2013-03-14 2:57 ` [PATCH 6/7] workqueue: separate out pool_workqueue locking into pwq_lock Tejun Heo
2013-03-14 2:57 ` [PATCH 7/7] workqueue: rename workqueue_lock to wq_mayday_lock Tejun Heo
2013-03-18 19:51 ` [PATCHSET wq/for-3.10] workqueue: break up workqueue_lock into multiple locks Tejun Heo
2013-03-20 14:01 ` JoonSoo Kim
2013-03-20 14:38 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363229845-6831-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox