From: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
<p_gortmaker@yahoo.com>, <dchen@diasemi.com>,
<rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Subject: Re: [Patch v1] rtc: fix for the DA9052 rtc device registration
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:12:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1363693365.6897.1.camel@dhruva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130318152145.3a458537db6c4799311a2143@linux-foundation.org>
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 15:21 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:59:39 +0530 Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com> wrote:
>
> > DA9052/53 MFD core handles only virtual irq therefore rtc driver needs
> > to be updated to work on virtual irq. Without this update DA9052/53 rtc
> > driver will fail during its registration.
> > Also getting irq by it name is no longer supported in DA9052/53 core.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c
> > @@ -239,10 +239,10 @@ static int da9052_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >
> > rtc->da9052 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc);
> > - rtc->irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "ALM");
> > - ret = request_threaded_irq(rtc->irq, NULL, da9052_rtc_irq,
> > - IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> > - "ALM", rtc);
> > + rtc->irq = DA9052_IRQ_ALARM;
> > +
> > + ret = da9052_request_irq(rtc->da9052, rtc->irq, "ALM",
> > + da9052_rtc_irq, rtc);
> > if (ret != 0) {
> > rtc_err(rtc->da9052, "irq registration failed: %d\n", ret);
> > return ret;
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c was converted to use
> devm_request_threaded_irq() after linux-3.8, so I cannot apply this
> patch to mainline. Can you please prepare a patch against 3.9-rc3?
Yes.
>
> Do you believe that the patch should be backported into -stable
> kernels? If so, Greg will need a different version of it - ie, the one
> you have just sent. Please send that to him at the appropriate time
> (say, when you see me drop the 3.9-rc3 version from the -mm tree).
Ok, I will do the necessary.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-19 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-15 8:29 [Patch v1] rtc: fix for the DA9052 rtc device registration Ashish Jangam
2013-03-18 22:21 ` Andrew Morton
2013-03-19 11:42 ` Ashish Jangam [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1363693365.6897.1.camel@dhruva \
--to=ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dchen@diasemi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p_gortmaker@yahoo.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox