public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 09/14] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:43:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364453020-2829-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364453020-2829-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Break init_and_link_pwq() into init_pwq() and link_pwq() and move
unbound-workqueue specific handling into apply_workqueue_attrs().
Also, factor out unbound pool and pool_workqueue allocation into
alloc_unbound_pwq().

This reorganization is to prepare for NUMA affinity and doesn't
introduce any functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5b53705..58c7663 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3626,13 +3626,10 @@ static void pwq_adjust_max_active(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
 	spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
 }
 
-static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
-			      struct workqueue_struct *wq,
-			      struct worker_pool *pool,
-			      struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+/* initialize newly zalloced @pwq which is associated with @wq and @pool */
+static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+		     struct worker_pool *pool)
 {
-	int node;
-
 	BUG_ON((unsigned long)pwq & WORK_STRUCT_FLAG_MASK);
 
 	pwq->pool = pool;
@@ -3642,8 +3639,15 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->delayed_works);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->mayday_node);
 	INIT_WORK(&pwq->unbound_release_work, pwq_unbound_release_workfn);
+}
 
-	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+/* sync @pwq with the current state of its associated wq and link it */
+static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
+		     struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+{
+	struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
 
 	/*
 	 * Set the matching work_color.  This is synchronized with
@@ -3658,14 +3662,29 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
 
 	/* link in @pwq */
 	list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
+}
 
-	if (wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) {
-		copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, pool->attrs);
-		for_each_node(node)
-			rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+/* obtain a pool matching @attr and create a pwq associating the pool and @wq */
+static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+					const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
+{
+	struct worker_pool *pool;
+	struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
+
+	pool = get_unbound_pool(attrs);
+	if (!pool)
+		return NULL;
+
+	pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pwq) {
+		put_unbound_pool(pool);
+		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
+	init_pwq(pwq, wq, pool);
+	return pwq;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -3686,8 +3705,8 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 			  const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
 {
 	struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs;
-	struct pool_workqueue *pwq = NULL, *last_pwq;
-	struct worker_pool *pool;
+	struct pool_workqueue *pwq, *last_pwq;
+	int node;
 
 	/* only unbound workqueues can change attributes */
 	if (WARN_ON(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
@@ -3706,22 +3725,21 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	cpumask_and(new_attrs->cpumask, new_attrs->cpumask, cpu_possible_mask);
 
 	mutex_lock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-
-	pwq = kmem_cache_zalloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pwq) {
-		mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	pwq = alloc_unbound_pwq(wq, new_attrs);
+	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	if (!pwq)
 		goto enomem;
-	}
 
-	pool = get_unbound_pool(new_attrs);
-	if (!pool) {
-		mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
-		goto enomem;
-	}
+	mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
 
-	mutex_unlock(&wq_pool_mutex);
+	link_pwq(pwq, &last_pwq);
+
+	copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, new_attrs);
+	for_each_node(node)
+		rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+
+	mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 
-	init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, pool, &last_pwq);
 	if (last_pwq) {
 		spin_lock_irq(&last_pwq->pool->lock);
 		put_pwq(last_pwq);
@@ -3731,7 +3749,6 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
 	return 0;
 
 enomem:
-	kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
 	free_workqueue_attrs(new_attrs);
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -3752,7 +3769,11 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 			struct worker_pool *cpu_pools =
 				per_cpu(cpu_worker_pools, cpu);
 
-			init_and_link_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri], NULL);
+			init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri]);
+
+			mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
+			link_pwq(pwq, NULL);
+			mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 		}
 		return 0;
 	} else {
-- 
1.8.1.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-28  6:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-28  6:43 Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 01/14] workqueue: move pwq_pool_locking outside of get/put_unbound_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 02/14] workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[] Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 03/14] workqueue: drop 'H' from kworker names of unbound worker pools Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 04/14] workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 05/14] workqueue: add workqueue->unbound_attrs Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 06/14] workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 07/14] workqueue: move hot fields of workqueue_struct to the end Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 08/14] workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 10/14] workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 11/14] workqueue: introduce numa_pwq_tbl_install() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 12/14] workqueue: introduce put_pwq_unlocked() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 13/14] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-29 22:44   ` [PATCH v4 " Tejun Heo
     [not found]     ` <CACvQF50c3m3eMiGKctagoOe6s3uhehfFy733imBfnLKTXSqZ4A@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <CAOS58YOgwB4s4-2e528T6SV36pDxLS3Zx+b5eR0L2kQjiZBEnw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-30 17:23         ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-31 19:06           ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:28   ` [PATCH v5 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-28  6:43 ` [PATCH 14/14] workqueue: update sysfs interface to reflect NUMA awareness and a kernel param to disable NUMA affinity Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:27 ` [PATCH 0.5/14] workqueue: fix memory leak in apply_workqueue_attrs() Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:29 ` Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1364453020-2829-10-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zab@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox