From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/14] workqueue: introduce numa_pwq_tbl_install()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:43:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364453020-2829-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364453020-2829-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Factor out pool_workqueue linking and installation into numa_pwq_tbl[]
from apply_workqueue_attrs() into numa_pwq_tbl_install(). link_pwq()
is made safe to call multiple times. numa_pwq_tbl_install() links the
pwq, installs it into numa_pwq_tbl[] at the specified node and returns
the old entry.
@last_pwq is removed from link_pwq() as the return value of the new
function can be used instead.
This is to prepare for NUMA affinity support for unbound workqueues.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index a4420be..527dc418 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3639,24 +3639,26 @@ static void init_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
pwq->flush_color = -1;
pwq->refcnt = 1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->delayed_works);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->pwqs_node);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->mayday_node);
INIT_WORK(&pwq->unbound_release_work, pwq_unbound_release_workfn);
}
/* sync @pwq with the current state of its associated wq and link it */
-static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq,
- struct pool_workqueue **p_last_pwq)
+static void link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
{
struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
+ /* may be called multiple times, ignore if already linked */
+ if (!list_empty(&pwq->pwqs_node))
+ return;
+
/*
* Set the matching work_color. This is synchronized with
* wq->mutex to avoid confusing flush_workqueue().
*/
- if (p_last_pwq)
- *p_last_pwq = first_pwq(wq);
pwq->work_color = wq->work_color;
/* sync max_active to the current setting */
@@ -3689,6 +3691,23 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
return pwq;
}
+/* install @pwq into @wq's numa_pwq_tbl[] for @node and return the old pwq */
+static struct pool_workqueue *numa_pwq_tbl_install(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
+ int node,
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
+{
+ struct pool_workqueue *old_pwq;
+
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wq->mutex);
+
+ /* link_pwq() can handle duplicate calls */
+ link_pwq(pwq);
+
+ old_pwq = rcu_access_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node]);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+ return old_pwq;
+}
+
/**
* apply_workqueue_attrs - apply new workqueue_attrs to an unbound workqueue
* @wq: the target workqueue
@@ -3707,7 +3726,7 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
{
struct workqueue_attrs *new_attrs;
- struct pool_workqueue *pwq, *last_pwq;
+ struct pool_workqueue *pwq, *last_pwq = NULL;
int node;
/* only unbound workqueues can change attributes */
@@ -3734,11 +3753,9 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- link_pwq(pwq, &last_pwq);
-
copy_workqueue_attrs(wq->unbound_attrs, new_attrs);
for_each_node(node)
- rcu_assign_pointer(wq->numa_pwq_tbl[node], pwq);
+ last_pwq = numa_pwq_tbl_install(wq, node, pwq);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
@@ -3774,7 +3791,7 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
init_pwq(pwq, wq, &cpu_pools[highpri]);
mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
- link_pwq(pwq, NULL);
+ link_pwq(pwq);
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
}
return 0;
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-28 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 6:43 Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 01/14] workqueue: move pwq_pool_locking outside of get/put_unbound_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 02/14] workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[] Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 03/14] workqueue: drop 'H' from kworker names of unbound worker pools Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 04/14] workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 05/14] workqueue: add workqueue->unbound_attrs Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 06/14] workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 07/14] workqueue: move hot fields of workqueue_struct to the end Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 08/14] workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 09/14] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 10/14] workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 12/14] workqueue: introduce put_pwq_unlocked() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 13/14] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-29 22:44 ` [PATCH v4 " Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CACvQF50c3m3eMiGKctagoOe6s3uhehfFy733imBfnLKTXSqZ4A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAOS58YOgwB4s4-2e528T6SV36pDxLS3Zx+b5eR0L2kQjiZBEnw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-30 17:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-31 19:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 14/14] workqueue: update sysfs interface to reflect NUMA awareness and a kernel param to disable NUMA affinity Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:27 ` [PATCH 0.5/14] workqueue: fix memory leak in apply_workqueue_attrs() Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:29 ` Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364453020-2829-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox