From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: laijs@cn.fujitsu.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, jack@suse.cz, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
jmoyer@redhat.com, zab@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 12/14] workqueue: introduce put_pwq_unlocked()
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:43:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364453020-2829-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364453020-2829-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Factor out lock pool, put_pwq(), unlock sequence into
put_pwq_unlocked(). The two existing places are converted and there
will be more with NUMA affinity support.
This is to prepare for NUMA affinity support for unbound workqueues
and doesn't introduce any functional difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/workqueue.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 527dc418..e656931 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1057,6 +1057,25 @@ static void put_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
schedule_work(&pwq->unbound_release_work);
}
+/**
+ * put_pwq_unlocked - put_pwq() with surrounding pool lock/unlock
+ * @pwq: pool_workqueue to put (can be %NULL)
+ *
+ * put_pwq() with locking. This function also allows %NULL @pwq.
+ */
+static void put_pwq_unlocked(struct pool_workqueue *pwq)
+{
+ if (pwq) {
+ /*
+ * As both pwqs and pools are sched-RCU protected, the
+ * following lock operations are safe.
+ */
+ spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
+ put_pwq(pwq);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
+ }
+}
+
static void pwq_activate_delayed_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_work_pwq(work);
@@ -3759,12 +3778,7 @@ int apply_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
- if (last_pwq) {
- spin_lock_irq(&last_pwq->pool->lock);
- put_pwq(last_pwq);
- spin_unlock_irq(&last_pwq->pool->lock);
- }
-
+ put_pwq_unlocked(last_pwq);
return 0;
enomem:
@@ -3975,16 +3989,12 @@ void destroy_workqueue(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
} else {
/*
* We're the sole accessor of @wq at this point. Directly
- * access the first pwq and put the base ref. As both pwqs
- * and pools are sched-RCU protected, the lock operations
- * are safe. @wq will be freed when the last pwq is
- * released.
+ * access the first pwq and put the base ref. @wq will be
+ * freed when the last pwq is released.
*/
pwq = list_first_entry(&wq->pwqs, struct pool_workqueue,
pwqs_node);
- spin_lock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
- put_pwq(pwq);
- spin_unlock_irq(&pwq->pool->lock);
+ put_pwq_unlocked(pwq);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(destroy_workqueue);
--
1.8.1.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-28 6:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-28 6:43 Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 01/14] workqueue: move pwq_pool_locking outside of get/put_unbound_pool() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 02/14] workqueue: add wq_numa_tbl_len and wq_numa_possible_cpumask[] Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 03/14] workqueue: drop 'H' from kworker names of unbound worker pools Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 04/14] workqueue: determine NUMA node of workers accourding to the allowed cpumask Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 05/14] workqueue: add workqueue->unbound_attrs Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 06/14] workqueue: make workqueue->name[] fixed len Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 07/14] workqueue: move hot fields of workqueue_struct to the end Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 08/14] workqueue: map an unbound workqueues to multiple per-node pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 09/14] workqueue: break init_and_link_pwq() into two functions and introduce alloc_unbound_pwq() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 10/14] workqueue: use NUMA-aware allocation for pool_workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 11/14] workqueue: introduce numa_pwq_tbl_install() Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 13/14] workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
2013-03-29 22:44 ` [PATCH v4 " Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <CACvQF50c3m3eMiGKctagoOe6s3uhehfFy733imBfnLKTXSqZ4A@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAOS58YOgwB4s4-2e528T6SV36pDxLS3Zx+b5eR0L2kQjiZBEnw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-03-30 17:23 ` Lai Jiangshan
2013-03-31 19:06 ` Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:28 ` [PATCH v5 " Tejun Heo
2013-03-28 6:43 ` [PATCH 14/14] workqueue: update sysfs interface to reflect NUMA awareness and a kernel param to disable NUMA affinity Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:27 ` [PATCH 0.5/14] workqueue: fix memory leak in apply_workqueue_attrs() Tejun Heo
2013-04-01 18:29 ` Subject: [PATCHSET v2 wq/for-3.10] workqueue: NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364453020-2829-13-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zab@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox