From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756914Ab3C3QGl (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:06:41 -0400 Received: from mail-da0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]:36023 "EHLO mail-da0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756609Ab3C3QGk (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:06:40 -0400 Message-ID: <1364659590.15109.5.camel@phoenix> Subject: [RFT][PATCH 2/2] pwm: lpc32xx: Don't change PWM_ENABLE bit in lpc32xx_pwm_config From: Axel Lin To: Thierry Reding Cc: Alexandre Pereira da Silva , Roland Stigge , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2013 00:06:30 +0800 In-Reply-To: <1364659529.15109.4.camel@phoenix> References: <1364659529.15109.4.camel@phoenix> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.2-0ubuntu0.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org lpc32xx_pwm_config() is supposed to set duty_ns and period_ns, it should not change PWM_ENABLE bit. Signed-off-by: Axel Lin --- drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c index 1a5075e..ac4d28d 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpc32xx.c @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int lpc32xx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, c = 255; duty_cycles = 256 - c; - writel(PWM_ENABLE | PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles), + writel(PWM_RELOADV(period_cycles) | PWM_DUTY(duty_cycles), lpc32xx->base + (pwm->hwpwm << 2)); return 0; -- 1.7.10.4