From: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: n_tty_write() going into schedule but NOT coming out
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2013 09:38:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1364909922.3617.41.camel@thor.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <515ADC96.7090908@synopsys.com>
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 18:56 +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 04/01/2013 08:40 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-04-01 at 19:27 +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >> On 03/30/2013 06:05 PM, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> >>> Hung find task is sitting in the schedule() call in n_tty_write()
> >>>
> >>> [ARCLinux]$ cat /proc/281/stack
> >>> [<8065945e>] n_tty_write+0x23a/0x424
> >>> [<80655cd4>] tty_write+0x1ac/0x2d4
> >>> [<805976ba>] vfs_write+0x92/0x110
> >>> [<80597816>] sys_write+0x4e/0x88
> >>> [<8050e780>] ret_from_system_call+0x0/0x4
> > Likely the writer is stuck because the receive buffer is full and the
> > reader is hung. What are the respective shells and telnetd doing?
>
> I don't undersand how the receive buffer full/empty is coming into play - that
> schedule() call is not a wait queue or something
If n_tty_write() blocks [the schedule() call], then it is on a wait
queue (tty->write_wait) which is woken by pty's unthrottle() called from
n_tty_read from the linked pty when space becomes available in the
receive buffer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-02 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-30 12:35 n_tty_write() going into schedule but NOT coming out Vineet Gupta
2013-04-01 13:57 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-01 15:10 ` Peter Hurley
2013-04-02 11:09 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-02 13:26 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-02 13:38 ` Peter Hurley [this message]
2013-04-05 19:52 ` Peter Hurley
2013-04-06 9:32 ` Vineet Gupta
2013-04-03 5:44 ` Ilya Zykov
2013-04-03 7:42 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1364909922.3617.41.camel@thor.lan \
--to=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox