From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
devel@linuxdriverproject.org, ohering@suse.com,
jbottomley@parallels.com, hch@infradead.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, kys@microsoft.com
Subject: scanning for LUNs
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:12:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365088357-22624-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com> (raw)
Here is the code snippet for scanning LUNS (drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c in function
__scsi_scan_target()):
/*
* Scan LUN 0, if there is some response, scan further. Ideally, we
* would not configure LUN 0 until all LUNs are scanned.
*/
res = scsi_probe_and_add_lun(starget, 0, &bflags, NULL, rescan, NULL);
if (res == SCSI_SCAN_LUN_PRESENT || res == SCSI_SCAN_TARGET_PRESENT) {
if (scsi_report_lun_scan(starget, bflags, rescan) != 0)
So, if we don't get a response while scanning LUN0, we will not use scsi_report_lun_scan().
On Hyper-V, the scsi emulation on the host does not treat LUN0 as anything special and we
could have situations where the only device under a scsi controller is at a location other than 0
or 1. In this case the standard LUN scanning code in Linux fails to detect this device. Is this
behaviour expected? Why is LUN0 treated differently here. Looking at the scsi spec, I am not sure
if this is what is specified. Any help/guidance will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
K. Y
next reply other threads:[~2013-04-04 14:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-04 15:12 K. Y. Srinivasan [this message]
2013-04-04 15:15 ` scanning for LUNs James Bottomley
2013-04-04 17:12 ` KY Srinivasan
2013-04-08 14:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
2013-04-08 17:34 ` KY Srinivasan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365088357-22624-1-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com \
--to=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ohering@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox