public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>,
	Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>,
	Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@gmail.com>,
	Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@lge.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] sched: Update rq clock on nohz CPU before setting fair group shares
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:05:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365577512.30071.11.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFTL4hxcQyv_J4ky8wL0rzVemWPpBcjuCV=FeHBvXn5Bht-3OA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 15:21 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> Also please check those two patches in my series, it's a draft for an
> rq clock debug framework. For now it's just a brainless stale clock
> check but that's a start:
> 
> * http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1470769/focus=1470786
> * http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1470769/focus=1470750

Right.. I was thinking of something like function-graph trace, where
we'd mark the context (fgraph_data I think its called) of the function
calling update_rq_clock() (and inherit this state on all child
contexts) and then verify the current context has this marker set when
we read ->clock.


Now clearly that would not work for something like:

  a()
   b()
    update_rq_clock()
   c()
    read_rq_clock()

since we'd loose the marker once we pop b, but I'm not sure how common
this is.

Also, we could issue a warning when calling update_rq_clock() and the
marker is already set.

There's a further issue where we need to track the rq we updated vs the
rq we're reading, but I think even without that this might be of some
help.


I think Mike once tried something along the lines of keeping a per rq
state that got cleared at the end of schedule() but that doesn't catch
things like the migrate handlers I think.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-10  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-06 16:45 [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Full dynticks rq clock handling Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-06 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched: Update rq clock on nohz CPU before migrating tasks Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-08 11:48   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-09  9:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-09 13:11     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-06 16:45 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched: Update rq clock on nohz CPU before setting fair group shares Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-09  9:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-09 13:21     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-10  7:05       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-04-10 10:06         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-10 11:02           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 11:06             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-10 11:47               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 11:50                 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-06 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched: Update rq clock on tickless CPUs before calling check_preempt_curr() Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-09 13:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-09 16:53     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-06 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched: Update rq clock earlier in unthrottle_cfs_rq Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-06 16:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: Update rq clock before idle balancing Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-06 16:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: Use an accessor to read rq clock Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-06 16:46 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched: Debug nohz " Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-10 10:26 ` [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Full dynticks rq clock handling Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 10:29   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-11 15:11   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1365577512.30071.11.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=abogani@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=geoff@infradead.org \
    --cc=gilad@benyossef.com \
    --cc=hakanakkan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox