From: Michael Bohan <mbohan@codeaurora.org>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] hrtimer: Consider preemption when migrating hrtimer cpu_bases
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:07:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365628068-32738-2-git-send-email-mbohan@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365628068-32738-1-git-send-email-mbohan@codeaurora.org>
When switching to a new cpu_base in switch_hrtimer_base(), we
briefly enable preemption by unlocking the cpu_base lock in two
places. During this interval it's possible for the running thread
to be swapped to a different CPU.
Consider the following example:
CPU #0 CPU #1
---- ----
hrtimer_start() ...
lock_hrtimer_base()
switch_hrtimer_base()
this_cpu = 0;
target_cpu_base = 0;
raw_spin_unlock(&cpu_base->lock)
<migrate to CPU 1>
... this_cpu == 0
cpu == this_cpu
timer->base = CPU #0
timer->base != LOCAL_CPU
Since the cached this_cpu is no longer accurate, we'll skip the
hrtimer_check_target() check. Once we eventually go to program
the hardware, we'll decide not to do so since it knows the real
CPU that we're running on is not the same as the chosen base. As
a consequence, we may end up missing the hrtimer's deadline.
Fix this by updating the local CPU number each time we retake a
cpu_base lock in switch_hrtimer_base().
Another possibility is to disable preemption across the whole of
switch_hrtimer_base. This looks suboptimal since preemption
would be disabled while waiting for lock(s).
Signed-off-by: Michael Bohan <mbohan@codeaurora.org>
---
kernel/hrtimer.c | 4 +++-
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c
index cc47812..3f0bce9 100644
--- a/kernel/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c
@@ -225,10 +225,12 @@ again:
raw_spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
+ this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
if (cpu != this_cpu && hrtimer_check_target(timer, new_base)) {
- cpu = this_cpu;
raw_spin_unlock(&new_base->cpu_base->lock);
raw_spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->lock);
+ cpu = smp_processor_id();
timer->base = base;
goto again;
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 21:07 [PATCH 0/2] hrtimer preemption bug fixes Michael Bohan
2013-04-10 21:07 ` Michael Bohan [this message]
2013-04-18 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] hrtimer: Consider preemption when migrating hrtimer cpu_bases Thomas Gleixner
2013-04-19 1:37 ` Michael Bohan
2013-04-10 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] hrtimer: Prevent enqueue of hrtimer on dead CPU Michael Bohan
2013-04-18 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365628068-32738-2-git-send-email-mbohan@codeaurora.org \
--to=mbohan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).