From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com>,
Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: cfq-iosched: update documentation help for cfq tunnables
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:25:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1365873934.18069.96@driftwood> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364698505-22236-1-git-send-email-linkinjeon@gmail.com> (from linkinjeon@gmail.com on Sat Mar 30 21:55:04 2013)
Cleaning out "look at this" directory, I don't see this applied
upstream but it may already be in Jens' tree. (That's the tree it
should go in through...)
On 03/30/2013 09:55:04 PM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
>
> Add the documentation text for latency, target_latency & group_idle
> tunnable parameters in the block/cfq-iosched.txt.
> Also fix few typo(spelling) mistakes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahrawat@samsung.com>
> ---
> Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt | 47
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt
> b/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt
> index a5eb7d1..4d02bca 100644
> --- a/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/block/cfq-iosched.txt
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ The main aim of CFQ scheduler is to provide a fair
> allocation of the disk
> I/O bandwidth for all the processes which requests an I/O operation.
>
> CFQ maintains the per process queue for the processes which request
> I/O
> -operation(syncronous requests). In case of asynchronous requests,
> all the
> +operation(synchronous requests). In case of asynchronous requests,
> all the
> requests from all the processes are batched together according to
> their
> process's I/O priority.
>
> @@ -66,6 +66,47 @@ This parameter is used to set the timeout of
> synchronous requests. Default
> value of this is 124ms. In case to favor synchronous requests over
> asynchronous
> one, this value should be decreased relative to fifo_expire_async.
>
> +group_idle
> +-----------
> +This parameter forces idling at the CFQ group level instead of CFQ
You don't need to say "this parameter", you can just start with "Force
idling at..."
> +queue level. This is introduced after after a bottleneck was observed
> +in higher end storage due to idle on sequential queuee and allow
> dispatch
queuee
> +from a single queue. The idea with this parameter is that it be be
> run with
> +slice_idle=0 and group_idle=8, so that idling does not happen on
> individual
> +queues in the group but happens overall on the group and still keep
> the IO
> +controller working.
> +Not idling on individual queues in the group will dispatch requests
> from
> +multiple queues in the group at the same time and achieve higher
> throughput
> +on higher end storage.
> +
> +Default value for this parameter is 8ms.
> +
> +latency
> +-------
> +This parameter is used to enable/disable the latency mode of the CFQ
"Enable/disable the latency mode..."
> +scheduler. So if latency mode (called low_latency) is enabled, then
> CFQ tries
> +to recompute the slice time for each process based on the
> target_latency set
> +for the system. This favors the fairness over throughput. Disabling
> low
> +latency (setting it to 0) ignores target latency, allowing each
> process in the
> +system to get a full time slice.
> +
> +By default low latency mode is enabled.
Why are latency and target_latency separate parameters? (0 already
disables it... the logical thing to do...?)
I.E. why does this knob even exist separate from target_latency?
> +target_latency
> +--------------
> +This parameter is used to calculate the time slice for a process if
> cfq's
> +latency mode is enabled. It will ensure that sync requests have an
> estimated
> +latency. But sometime if sequential workload is more (e.g.
> sequential read),
> +then to meet the latency constraints, throughput may decrease
> because of less
> +time for each process to issue I/O request before the cfq queue is
> switched.
> +
> +Though this can be overcome by disabling the latency_mode, but it
> may increase
> +the read latency for some applications. So, this parameter allows
> for changing
> +target_latency through sysfs interface which can provide the balanced
> +throughput and read latency.
> +
> +Default value for target_latency is 300ms.
Sorry, I try not to rewrite, but this whole section can just be:
Cap outstanding I/O requests to this many miliseconds (default 300),
ensuring sync requests have an estimated latency. Lowering this may
decrease throughput on sequential workloads by switching queues more
often (interleaving other I/O).
(And it could ahve been called target_latency_ms to be
self-documenting. Oh well.)
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-14 6:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-31 2:55 [PATCH] Documentation: cfq-iosched: update documentation help for cfq tunnables Namjae Jeon
2013-04-09 12:58 ` Jens Axboe
2013-04-09 13:09 ` Namjae Jeon
2013-04-13 17:25 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2013-04-14 8:15 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1365873934.18069.96@driftwood \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=a.sahrawat@samsung.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linkinjeon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox