From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>,
backports@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] backports: add support for voltage / current regulator drivers
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:33:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366043632.8361.33.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130415162652.GK15837@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Mon, 2013-04-15 at 17:26 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:01:18PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 07:13 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > > This backports the latest regulator drivers for kernels >= 3.4.
> > > We enable the regulator only on kernels >= 3.4 given that
> > > it relies on the new probe deferral mechanism which would
> > > otherwise mean having to support drivers that do not probe
> > > correctly. Note that 3.2 had a base regulator implementation
> > > but that was just stubs.
>
> > Applied.
>
> Please let's at least discuss the issues here, I'm not sure what this is
> supposed to do but the analysis of the subsystem didn't seem complete.
I wouldn't worry about it too much. For some reason (media drivers
related?) Luis decided that it was worth including this in the backports
project (see http://backports.wiki.kernel.org) and I am currently
maintaining the git tree for that, at least while I was doing some
refactoring.
I do notice that it doesn't quite work, there are a lot of unresolved
symbols :)
If you think you'd be impacted by this because users demand support from
you for the backport or whatever I can revert this (or probably just
remove it from the copy list for now.) I don't really have an opinion on
it, I'm doing this because I'm interested in one specific wireless
driver.
johannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-15 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1365862424-6530-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@do-not-panic.com>
2013-04-13 14:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] backports: add support for voltage / current regulator drivers Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-04-13 21:01 ` Johannes Berg
2013-04-15 16:26 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-15 16:33 ` Johannes Berg [this message]
2013-04-22 13:11 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-23 6:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-04-15 16:25 ` Mark Brown
2013-04-13 14:13 ` [PATCH 6/7] backports: add media subsystem drivers Luis R. Rodriguez
2013-04-13 21:02 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366043632.8361.33.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=backports@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@do-not-panic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox