From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
mingo@kernel.org, pjt@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, efault@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend v6] sched: fix wrong rq's runnable_avg update with rt tasks
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:47:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366372036.24945.1.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366302867-5055-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 18:34 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> The current update of the rq's load can be erroneous when RT tasks are
> involved
>
> The update of the load of a rq that becomes idle, is done only if the avg_idle
> is less than sysctl_sched_migration_cost. If RT tasks and short idle duration
> alternate, the runnable_avg will not be updated correctly and the time will be
> accounted as idle time when a CFS task wakes up.
>
> A new idle_enter function is called when the next task is the idle function
> so the elapsed time will be accounted as run time in the load of the rq,
> whatever the average idle time is. The function update_rq_runnable_avg is
> removed from idle_balance.
>
> When a RT task is scheduled on an idle CPU, the update of the rq's load is
> not done when the rq exit idle state because CFS's functions are not
> called. Then, the idle_balance, which is called just before entering the
> idle function, updates the rq's load and makes the assumption that the
> elapsed time since the last update, was only running time.
>
> As a consequence, the rq's load of a CPU that only runs a periodic RT task,
> is close to LOAD_AVG_MAX whatever the running duration of the RT task is.
>
> A new idle_exit function is called when the prev task is the idle function
> so the elapsed time will be accounted as idle time in the rq's load.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Thanks Vince!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-19 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 16:34 [PATCH Resend v6] sched: fix wrong rq's runnable_avg update with rt tasks Vincent Guittot
2013-04-19 4:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-19 7:49 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-19 8:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-19 8:50 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-19 9:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-19 9:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-19 11:11 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-04-19 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-04-19 21:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-04-21 12:52 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Fix wrong rq' s " tip-bot for Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366372036.24945.1.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox