public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains()
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:59:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366631983.4443.11.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364277700-7509-3-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>

On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 15:01 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> @@ -5506,10 +5506,10 @@ static void rebalance_domains(int cpu, enum
> cpu_idle_type idle)
>                 if (time_after_eq(jiffies, sd->last_balance +
> interval)) {
>                         if (load_balance(cpu, rq, sd, idle, &balance))
> {
>                                 /*
> -                                * We've pulled tasks over so either
> we're no
> -                                * longer idle.
> +                                * We've pulled tasks over so either
> we may
> +                                * be no longer idle.
>                                  */

That comment didn't make sense and it does even less now.

How about we make that:

  /*
   * The LBF_SOME_PINNED logic could have changed
   * env->dst_cpu, so we can't know our idle state
   * even if we migrated tasks; update it.
   */

> -                               idle = CPU_NOT_IDLE;
> +                               idle = idle_cpu(cpu) ? CPU_IDLE :
> CPU_NOT_IDLE;
>                         }
>                         sd->last_balance = jiffies;
>                 }



  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-22 11:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-26  6:01 [PATCH v2 0/6] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26  6:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched: change position of resched_cpu() in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26  6:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-03-26  6:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26  6:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched: move up affinity check to mitigate useless redoing overhead Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26  6:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched: rename load_balance_tmpmask to load_balance_mask Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26  6:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: prevent to re-select dst-cpu in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 11:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-22  8:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 12:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-22 20:07     ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-04-23  8:31       ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-23  8:50     ` Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1366631983.4443.11.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox