From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: prevent to re-select dst-cpu in load_balance()
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 13:59:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366631994.4443.13.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1364277700-7509-7-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
On Tue, 2013-03-26 at 15:01 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group.
> But, in that, there is no code for preventing to re-select dst-cpu.
> So, same dst-cpu can be selected over and over.
>
> This patch add functionality to load_balance() in order to exclude
> cpu which is selected once. We prevent to re-select dst_cpu via
> env's cpus, so now, env's cpus is a candidate not only for src_cpus,
> but also dst_cpus.
Changelog forgets to mention that this removes the need for
lb_iterations.
> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index e3f09f4..6f238d2 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -3898,12 +3898,14 @@ int can_migrate_task(struct task_struct *p, struct lb_env *env)
> if (!env->dst_grpmask || (env->flags & LBF_SOME_PINNED))
> return 0;
>
> - new_dst_cpu = cpumask_first_and(env->dst_grpmask,
> - tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
> - if (new_dst_cpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
> - env->flags |= LBF_SOME_PINNED;
> - env->new_dst_cpu = new_dst_cpu;
> - }
> + /* Prevent to re-select dst_cpu via env's cpus */
> + for_each_cpu_and(cpu, env->dst_grpmask, env->cpus)
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tsk_cpus_allowed(p))) {
> + env->flags |= LBF_SOME_PINNED;
> + env->new_dst_cpu = cpu;
> + break;
> + }
/me hands you a fresh bucket of curlies.. always use them on multi-line
single statements.
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -4989,7 +4991,6 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
> int *balance)
> {
> int ld_moved, cur_ld_moved, active_balance = 0;
> - int lb_iterations, max_lb_iterations;
> struct sched_group *group;
> struct rq *busiest;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -5009,11 +5010,6 @@ static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
> * other cpus in our group */
> if (idle == CPU_NEWLY_IDLE) {
> env.dst_grpmask = NULL;
> - /* we don't care max_lb_iterations in this case,
> - * in following patch, this will be removed */
> - max_lb_iterations = 0;
> - } else {
> - max_lb_iterations = cpumask_weight(env.dst_grpmask);
> }
And here you leave curlies around a single line single statement (the
only case we do leave them off) -- maybe collect them to replenish your
supply?
> cpumask_copy(cpus, cpu_active_mask);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-26 6:01 [PATCH v2 0/6] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched: change position of resched_cpu() in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched: explicitly cpu_idle_type checking in rebalance_domains() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched: don't consider other cpus in our group in case of NEWLY_IDLE Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-03-26 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched: move up affinity check to mitigate useless redoing overhead Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched: rename load_balance_tmpmask to load_balance_mask Joonsoo Kim
2013-03-26 6:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched: prevent to re-select dst-cpu in load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-04-22 8:01 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] correct load_balance() Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-22 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-22 20:07 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2013-04-23 8:31 ` Joonsoo Kim
2013-04-23 8:50 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366631994.4443.13.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox