From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932291Ab3DYNYD (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:24:03 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:56710 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932244Ab3DYNYA (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2013 09:24:00 -0400 Message-ID: <1366896232.6139.21.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.4.41-rt55-feat1 From: Mike Galbraith To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Steven Rostedt , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Tim Sander , LKML , RT , Carsten Emde , John Kacur Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:23:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <1366760662.9609.176.camel@gandalf.local.home> <2156546.QlsX0XyPQz@dabox> <51792277.8000205@linutronix.de> <1366893374.6139.5.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1366893787.10248.4.camel@gandalf.local.home> <1366894324.10248.6.camel@gandalf.local.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:90QClqFU4DT0/6IY6tz0FhioOMn/ZoLetPAIYnwHkPe KoXO3UEbyySS7ibqvUdZH8WHN+C9XqZV82Z7Deph0aN1wE/Sq0 +DLyZVBf3lBJtHVxFcnQC4I4MRpM4I0evhK24bE2eCHNR324rR WmuILYfwepvaN5by1QONXJCCaiW7l0k0E2TDJXVGDkE5AJUvWe LzzcRqZciEYEBdBrKYNe6O/TQiEfKBgKFStqeeOGiSR2lcnn43 EFf1TE9MypJV7I40D1QTBPCgSOFvFB2nd4a5lRdV45kQUW/SzS awAEbBjEEW10mwvRsydP1t7jZhTSp+x9jUpoG2p6mq7GKRug/4 rwmDqxv7bemowxBo841MZgMa5XRxaCR8S2hb5maMRAot7u1CmZ t8BbmxubxekhA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 15:09 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:46 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2013, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 14:36 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > > hrtimer: fix hrtimer free zone build bug > > > > > > > > Perhaps the better solution is to select HIGH_RES_TIMERS when > > > > PREEMPT_RT_FULL is selected? > > > > > > No, why ? > > > > Why not? ;-) > > > > Except for the lack of support, one would think that if you want real > > time responses, you would also want a real time clock. > > Well, if your application is driven by an external interrupt, then you > do not need highres timers at all. (hey, that's cheating, generic config vs specialized;)