From: Olivier Langlois <olivier@trillion01.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] process cputimer is moving faster than its corresponding clock
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 01:06:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1367039190.12779.14.camel@Wailaba2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGf_=q5W1brnzmsK0bN9s07RXsRUyRoYKN347kySQs_3g2_Lg@mail.gmail.com>
> 2) tst-cputimer1.c only have CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID test and
> don't have any utime, stime tests.
>
Sorry, I should take a couple minutes break before pressing send to be
sure that I have said everything :-)
CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID is user space name for kernel space
CPUCLOCK_SCHED clock.
and your are correct. It doesn't have any utime and stime test. Hence
this is why I am reticent to state anything about them when we discussed
about the relevence of update_gt_cputime() once we have the patch in.
Greetings,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-27 5:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 17:59 [PATCH] process cputimer is moving faster than its corresponding clock Olivier Langlois
2013-04-10 11:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 15:48 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-12 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-15 1:55 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-12 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-12 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-12 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-15 6:11 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-19 13:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-19 17:38 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-19 18:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-26 4:40 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-26 6:27 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-26 19:08 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-27 1:51 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-27 2:15 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-27 5:02 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-27 5:17 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-27 5:31 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-27 5:06 ` Olivier Langlois [this message]
2013-04-27 4:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 0:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2013-04-29 17:29 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 5:06 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-29 17:10 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 17:41 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 17:56 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-29 18:20 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 18:31 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-29 18:54 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 19:09 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-29 21:20 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 22:42 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
[not found] ` <1367036552.7911.63.camel@Wailaba2>
2013-04-27 4:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] " Olivier Langlois
2013-04-27 4:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] " Olivier Langlois
2013-04-29 6:25 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-04-29 17:16 ` Olivier Langlois
2013-04-11 3:29 ` [PATCH] " Olivier Langlois
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1367039190.12779.14.camel@Wailaba2 \
--to=olivier@trillion01.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox