From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755492Ab3EHBQe (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 21:16:34 -0400 Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:51229 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752697Ab3EHBQc (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 May 2013 21:16:32 -0400 Message-ID: <1367975778.25488.108.camel@pasglop> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] PCI: Skip IORESOURCE_MMIO allocation for root bus without MMIO range From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Bjorn Helgaas , Gavin Shan , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 11:16:18 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: <1367965054-9013-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1367965054-9013-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1367965682.25488.26.camel@pasglop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 15:44 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote: > x86 32 socket system, we may need to leave more mmiol for only several > sockets to make them work with cards that does not support mmio 64 bit > pref. Ok, while on POWER each root bridge has its own distinct 32-bit space (mapped elsewhere in CPU space). So at least we don't have *that* specific problem :-) Cheers, Ben.