RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard]

Yuhong Bao
2013-05-10T01:02:41Z

----------------------------------------
> From: yuhongbao_386@hotmail.com
> To: lkcl@lkcl.net; hancockrwd@gmail.com
> CC: david.goodenough@btconnect.com; debian-arm@lists.debian.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk
> Subject: RE: device tree not the answer in the ARM world [was: Re: running Debian on a Cubieboard]
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 17:56:33 -0700
>
> > the economics of market forces don't work that way.
> > profit-maximising companies are pathologically and *LEGALLY* bound to
> > enact the articles of incorporation. so you'd need to show them that
> > it would hurt their profits to continue the way that they are going.
> I think legally bound is a myth, but that is off-topic for lkml of course.
And obviously it doesn't matter if it is actually required by law if they practically behave that way.

Yuhong Bao