public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: channing <chao.bi@intel.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty_buffer: avoid race due to tty_buffer_free_all() being misused
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 14:29:38 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1368772178.1876.31.camel@bichao> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5194D6F9.5000505@hurleysoftware.com>

On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 08:54 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On 05/16/2013 04:59 AM, channing wrote:
> >
> > In tty_buffer.c, function tty_buffer_free_all() is used to remove
> > all buffers for a tty, although it's declared that it mustn't be called
> > when the tty is in use, it cannot guarantee that. we can observe some
> > device driver make use it by mistake, for example, while tty device is
> > releasing, the tty data forwarding is not stopped, then it might hit
> > the case that tty buffer is being used while tty_buffer_free_all()
> > free this tty buffer, and finally lead to random error at any places,
> > and it's not clear to debug.
> 
> What kernel version?
3.4
> 
> > Although device driver could do better, it's simpler and safer to
> > strengthen protection in the view of tty buffer, by adding a tty->buf.lock
> > in tty_buffer_free_all() to avoid it racing with ongoing tty buffer
> > operations.
> 
> Sorry, but this isn't correct.
> 
> The driver cannot continue to perform i/o concurrently with
> tty_port_destroy().
> 
Thanks for remind, 3.4 haven't tty_port_destroy(), the mainline has
changed the way to call tty_buffer_free_all().

> If the concurrent use you're observing is with flush_to_ldisc(),
> that should be fixed in current mainline.
> 
Yes, when calling flush_to_ldisc() in Kernel 3.4, we could observe the
tty buffer is corrupted, and dummped stack shows that
tty_buffer_free_all() was called before. Is it a known issue fixed in
old version? would you please tell me related patch to solve this
flush_to_ldisc() issue? Thanks very much.

Chao


  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-17  6:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-16  8:59 [PATCH] tty_buffer: avoid race due to tty_buffer_free_all() being misused channing
2013-05-16 12:54 ` Peter Hurley
2013-05-17  6:29   ` channing [this message]
2013-05-17 18:47     ` Peter Hurley
2013-05-16 14:05 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1368772178.1876.31.camel@bichao \
    --to=chao.bi@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox