linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	x86@kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, fenghua.yu@intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/x86: construct all sibling maps if smt
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 14:48:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369831695-11970-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369674540-10601-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com>

Commit 316ad248307fb ("sched/x86: Rewrite set_cpu_sibling_map()") broke
the construction of sibling maps, which also broke the booted_cores
accounting.

Before the rewrite, if smt was present, then each map was updated for
each smt sibling. After the rewrite only cpu_sibling_mask gets updated,
as the llc and core maps depend on 'has_mc = x86_max_cores > 1' instead.
This leads to problems with topologies like the following

(qemu -smp sockets=2,cores=1,threads=2)

processor       : 0
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 1    <= should be 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 1

processor       : 1
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 1    <= should be 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 0    <= should be 1

processor       : 2
physical id     : 1
siblings        : 1    <= should be 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 1

processor       : 3
physical id     : 1
siblings        : 1    <= should be 2
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 0    <= should be 1

This patch restores the former construction by defining has_mc as
(has_smt || x86_max_cores > 1). This should be fine as there were no
(has_smt && !has_mc) conditions in the context.

v2:
 - rename has_mc to has_mp now that it's not just for cores

Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index 9c73b51817e47..bfd348e993692 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -372,15 +372,15 @@ static bool __cpuinit match_mc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
 
 void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
 {
-	bool has_mc = boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores > 1;
 	bool has_smt = smp_num_siblings > 1;
+	bool has_mp = has_smt || boot_cpu_data.x86_max_cores > 1;
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
 	struct cpuinfo_x86 *o;
 	int i;
 
 	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_setup_mask);
 
-	if (!has_smt && !has_mc) {
+	if (!has_mp) {
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_llc_shared_mask(cpu));
 		cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cpu_core_mask(cpu));
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
 		if ((i == cpu) || (has_smt && match_smt(c, o)))
 			link_mask(sibling, cpu, i);
 
-		if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_llc(c, o)))
+		if ((i == cpu) || (has_mp && match_llc(c, o)))
 			link_mask(llc_shared, cpu, i);
 
 	}
@@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ void __cpuinit set_cpu_sibling_map(int cpu)
 	for_each_cpu(i, cpu_sibling_setup_mask) {
 		o = &cpu_data(i);
 
-		if ((i == cpu) || (has_mc && match_mc(c, o))) {
+		if ((i == cpu) || (has_mp && match_mc(c, o))) {
 			link_mask(core, cpu, i);
 
 			/*
-- 
1.8.1.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-29 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-27 17:09 [PATCH] sched/x86: construct all sibling maps if smt Andrew Jones
2013-05-29 10:26 ` Andrew Jones
2013-05-29 11:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-29 11:11     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-29 12:48 ` Andrew Jones [this message]
2013-05-31 12:50   ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched/x86: Construct " tip-bot for Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1369831695-11970-1-git-send-email-drjones@redhat.com \
    --to=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).