linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	joeyli <jlee@suse.com>, Matt Fleming <matt@console-pimps.org>,
	matt.fleming@intel.com, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:35:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1370021732.6250.4.camel@dabdike> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130531162815.GA8082@srcf.ucam.org>

On Fri, 2013-05-31 at 17:28 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 10:43:49AM -0500, Russ Anderson wrote:
> 
> > When did writing EFI variables to nvram become necessary to boot on 
> > UEFI? And if it is necessary, why is it that only linux boot loaders 
> > that use EFI stubs (generally grub2) need it?  The current kernel 
> > boots using EFI/grub and EFI/elilo.  It is just when EFI stubs are 
> > used that the boot fails.
> 
> I think you've misunderstood the problem. If nvram becaomes full, some 
> systems crash during firmware initialisation. So we can't let nvram 
> become full. The obvious thing to do here is to look at the values from 
> QueryVariableInfo, but many systems won't perform any garbage collection 
> until they're almost out of space and so variables that have been 
> deleted still show up as used space. We can work around that by adding 
> up the size of the variables ourselves, but that only gives us the value 
> for runtime-visible variables. We also need to know how much space is 
> used by variables that are only visible during boot, hence calling 
> QueryVariableInfo before ExitBootServices.
> 
> > Which means the previous patch(es) that caused the bricking should
> > get pulled, too.
> 
> There are no patches that cause the bricking.

This is the description of the original problem:

http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Booting-Linux-using-UEFI-can-brick-Samsung-laptops-1793958.html

And the further investigation:

http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/22855.html

If you read the latter, it shows you why we have to use
QueryVariableInfo to try to work out how much space we have available.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-31 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-22 16:27 [regression, bisected] x86: efi: Pass boot services variable info to runtime code Russ Anderson
2013-05-23 11:58 ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-23 20:32   ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24  7:43     ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-24 11:09       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-24 11:40         ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-24 16:11       ` Robin Holt
2013-05-24 17:02         ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 21:05           ` Dave Jones
2013-05-27  4:27             ` joeyli
2013-05-27  4:32               ` joeyli
2013-05-28  2:43               ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 20:05       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24 20:11         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-24 20:49           ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-28 10:50             ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-28 10:53         ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-28  8:35       ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-29 21:01       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-29 22:22         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-29 22:46           ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-29 22:53             ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-30  2:16               ` joeyli
2013-05-30 22:17                 ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-30 22:21                   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-30 22:28                     ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-30 22:30                       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31  2:17                         ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31  3:28                           ` joeyli
2013-05-30 22:32                       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31  2:54                         ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 10:06                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-30 22:25                   ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31 10:12                     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 11:06                       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-05-31 11:40                         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 11:54                           ` Josh Boyer
2013-05-31 12:30                         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-05-31 12:43                           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-05-31 14:34                             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 14:42                               ` James Bottomley
2013-05-31 14:45                                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-31 14:48                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 15:43                                   ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 16:28                                     ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-31 17:35                                       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2013-05-31 22:57                                       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 22:59                                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-05-31 23:30                                         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-06-01  0:03                                         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-01  4:20                                           ` Russ Anderson
2013-06-01  4:41                                             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-01 11:01                               ` Linus Torvalds
2013-06-01 14:40                                 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-05-30  2:38             ` joeyli
2013-05-23 22:23   ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-24  7:45     ` Matt Fleming
2013-05-29 20:16       ` Russ Anderson
2013-05-31 14:41         ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1370021732.6250.4.camel@dabdike \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=matt@console-pimps.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=rja@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).