From: 송은봉 <eunb.song@samsung.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Re: I2C: Fix i2c fail problem when a process is terminated by a signal on octeon in 3.8
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:15:42 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <13700407.150151361920541315.JavaMail.weblogic@epml02> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr, Size: 2185 bytes --]
>If the wait is not interruptible, I think you will not be able to 'kill
>-9' a userspace process blocked here.
As your words. the process will not be killed immediately, but after timeout(2 jiffies) it will be killed.
I think that delay is acceptable.
------- Original Message -------
Sender : David Daney<ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Date : 2013-02-27 08:07 (GMT+09:00)
Title : Re: I2C: Fix i2c fail problem when a process is terminated by a signal on octeon in 3.8
On 02/26/2013 12:54 PM, ¼ÛÀººÀ wrote:
> I've been debugging the abnormal operation of i2c on octeon.
> If a process is terminated by signal in the middle of i2c operation,
> next i2c read operation which is done by another process was failed.
> So i changed to ignore signal in the middle of i2c operation.
> After that the problem was not reproduced.
>
This is a known issue. However I don't think the solution you have is
correct...
> Signed-off-by: EunBong Song > >
>
> diff -up drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c{.orig,}
> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c.orig 2013-02-21 08:09:03.168018843 -0800
> +++ drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c 2013-02-21 08:09:38.344018898 -0800
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static irqreturn_t octeon_i2c_isr(int ir
> struct octeon_i2c *i2c = dev_id;
>
> octeon_i2c_int_disable(i2c);
> - wake_up_interruptible(&i2c->queue);
> + wake_up(&i2c->queue);
>
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static int octeon_i2c_wait(struct octeon
>
> octeon_i2c_int_enable(i2c);
>
> - result = wait_event_interruptible_timeout(i2c->queue,
> + result = wait_event_timeout(i2c->queue,
If the wait is not interruptible, I think you will not be able to 'kill
-9' a userspace process blocked here.
> octeon_i2c_test_iflg(i2c),
> i2c->adap.timeout);
>
The real solution is to move processing of the I2C protocol to a kernel
thread and communicate between the this thread and userspace via a
command queue mechanism, much like the way it is done in the mmc/host
driver infrastructure.
David Daneyÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
next reply other threads:[~2013-02-26 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-26 23:15 송은봉 [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-03-22 15:03 Re: I2C: Fix i2c fail problem when a process is terminated by a signal on octeon in 3.8 EUNBONG SONG
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=13700407.150151361920541315.JavaMail.weblogic@epml02 \
--to=eunb.song@samsung.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).