Re: [PATCH] proc: Document that /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/children really is per-thread

[Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>]

On 06/26/2013 04:05:01 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I was surprised to discover that a process can have a parent that  
> isn't
> a thread group leader.  (The usual ppid interfaces hide this, but the
> children list exposes it.)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt  
> b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> index fd8d0d5..205796a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
> @@ -1623,6 +1623,12 @@ This file provides a fast way to retrieve  
> first level children pids
>  of a task pointed by <pid>/<tid> pair. The format is a space  
> separated
>  stream of pids.
> 
> +This really is a per-thread list.  If a process's parent is a thread,
> +then that process will appear in that thread's children list.  (This
> +means that, for any pid, /proc/pid/task/*/children are disjoint  
> lists.)
> +This may be surprising, as /proc/pid/status's PPid field is parent's
> +tgid as opposed to the parent's tid.

I've read this twice and still don't quite understand what it's saying.  
(Possibly I need more than 3 hours of sleep.)

It sounds like you're saying a thread can fork() and exec() and this  
makes proc look weird, because the ppid pooints to the thread group  
leader and not the thread, but the proc info listing us as a child  
belongs to the thread?

Is this a bug that should be fixed rather than documented? (Showing the  
right ppid for this corner case?)

Rob