linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:09:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372781381.3689.27.camel@linaro1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371575223-21702-5-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>

On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 18:07 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> 
> Few control settings done in architected timer as part of initialisation
> are lost when CPU enters deeper power states. They need to be re-initialised
> when the CPU is (warm)reset again.
> 
> This patch moves all such initialisation into separate function that can
> be used both in cold and warm CPU reset paths. It also adds CPU PM
> notifiers to do the timer initialisation on warm resets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 11aaf06..1c691b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
>  #include <linux/clockchips.h>
>  #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> @@ -123,10 +124,20 @@ static int arch_timer_set_next_event_phys(unsigned long evt,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int __cpuinit arch_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *clk)
> +static void arch_timer_initialise(void)
>  {
>  	int evt_stream_div, pos;
>  
> +	/* Find the closest power of two to the divisor */
> +	evt_stream_div = arch_timer_rate / ARCH_TIMER_EVT_STREAM_FREQ;
> +	pos = fls(evt_stream_div);
> +	if (pos > 1 && !(evt_stream_div & (1 << (pos - 2))))
> +		pos--;
> +	arch_counter_set_user_access(min(pos, 15));

Would it not be good to calculate the value once in arch_timer_setup
rather than repeatedly in this function? The calculations aren't that
expensive, but when I gave these patches a spin on TC2 I noticed that
this function gets called >500 times a second, so it seems a bit
wasteful.

> +}
> +
> +static int __cpuinit arch_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *clk)
> +{
>  	clk->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP;
>  	clk->name = "arch_sys_timer";
>  	clk->rating = 450;
> @@ -155,12 +166,7 @@ static int __cpuinit arch_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *clk)
>  			enable_percpu_irq(arch_timer_ppi[PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI], 0);
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Find the closest power of two to the divisor */
> -	evt_stream_div = arch_timer_rate / ARCH_TIMER_EVT_STREAM_FREQ;
> -	pos = fls(evt_stream_div);
> -	if (pos > 1 && !(evt_stream_div & (1 << (pos - 2))))
> -		pos--;
> -	arch_counter_set_user_access(min(pos, 15));
> +	arch_timer_initialise();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -267,6 +273,31 @@ static struct notifier_block arch_timer_cpu_nb __cpuinitdata = {
>  	.notifier_call = arch_timer_cpu_notify,
>  };
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> +static int arch_timer_cpu_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> +				    unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> +	if (action == CPU_PM_EXIT)
> +		arch_timer_initialise();
> +
> +	return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block arch_timer_cpu_pm_notifier = {
> +	.notifier_call = arch_timer_cpu_pm_notify,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init arch_timer_cpu_pm_init(void)
> +{
> +	return cpu_pm_register_notifier(&arch_timer_cpu_pm_notifier);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int __init arch_timer_cpu_pm_init(void)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static int __init arch_timer_register(void)
>  {
>  	int err;
> @@ -316,11 +347,17 @@ static int __init arch_timer_register(void)
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_free_irq;
>  
> +	err = arch_timer_cpu_pm_init();
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_unreg_notify;
> +
>  	/* Immediately configure the timer on the boot CPU */
>  	arch_timer_setup(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> +out_unreg_notify:
> +	unregister_cpu_notifier(&arch_timer_cpu_nb);
>  out_free_irq:
>  	if (arch_timer_use_virtual)
>  		free_percpu_irq(arch_timer_ppi[VIRT_PPI], arch_timer_evt);

-- 
Tixy


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-18 17:06 [PATCH 0/4] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] drivers: clocksource: configure event stream for ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: arch_timer: add macros for bits in control register Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM/ARM64: arch_timer: remove __cpuinit attribute for arch_counter_set_user_access Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:58   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-02 16:09   ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2013-07-02 17:24     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers: clocksource: configure event stream for ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 10:23     ` Catalin Marinas
2013-07-23 10:33       ` Will Deacon
2013-07-23 11:12         ` Catalin Marinas
2013-07-25  9:45     ` [PATCH v3 " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-12 13:32       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: arch_timer: add macros for bits in control register Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-02  9:32   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-02  9:48     ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-02  9:55       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-02 12:12         ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-05 16:25           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-06  8:09             ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-06  9:01               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-12 13:16                 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-13 17:29   ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29     ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM/ARM64: arch_timer: add macros for bits in control register Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14  8:50       ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-14  9:03         ` Marc Zyngier
2013-08-14  9:23           ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-13 17:29     ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drivers: clocksource: configure event stream for ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29     ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ARM: arch_timer: configure and enable event stream Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29     ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM64: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 13:27       ` Will Deacon
2013-08-20 14:27         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 16:16           ` Will Deacon
2013-08-20 16:23             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 17:08       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-21 17:52         ` Will Deacon
2013-08-13 17:29     ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drivers: clocksource: enable hwcaps for event stream on ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29     ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14  9:08     ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-14  9:17       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 10:51         ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-14 11:03           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 15:00             ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-20 17:14     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-23  9:26       ` Catalin Marinas
2013-08-23  9:57         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1372781381.3689.27.camel@linaro1.home \
    --to=tixy@linaro.org \
    --cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).