From: "Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@linaro.org>
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will.deacon@arm.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:09:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1372781381.3689.27.camel@linaro1.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371575223-21702-5-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 18:07 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
>
> Few control settings done in architected timer as part of initialisation
> are lost when CPU enters deeper power states. They need to be re-initialised
> when the CPU is (warm)reset again.
>
> This patch moves all such initialisation into separate function that can
> be used both in cold and warm CPU reset paths. It also adds CPU PM
> notifiers to do the timer initialisation on warm resets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 11aaf06..1c691b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> #include <linux/cpu.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/clockchips.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> @@ -123,10 +124,20 @@ static int arch_timer_set_next_event_phys(unsigned long evt,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int __cpuinit arch_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *clk)
> +static void arch_timer_initialise(void)
> {
> int evt_stream_div, pos;
>
> + /* Find the closest power of two to the divisor */
> + evt_stream_div = arch_timer_rate / ARCH_TIMER_EVT_STREAM_FREQ;
> + pos = fls(evt_stream_div);
> + if (pos > 1 && !(evt_stream_div & (1 << (pos - 2))))
> + pos--;
> + arch_counter_set_user_access(min(pos, 15));
Would it not be good to calculate the value once in arch_timer_setup
rather than repeatedly in this function? The calculations aren't that
expensive, but when I gave these patches a spin on TC2 I noticed that
this function gets called >500 times a second, so it seems a bit
wasteful.
> +}
> +
> +static int __cpuinit arch_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *clk)
> +{
> clk->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT | CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_C3STOP;
> clk->name = "arch_sys_timer";
> clk->rating = 450;
> @@ -155,12 +166,7 @@ static int __cpuinit arch_timer_setup(struct clock_event_device *clk)
> enable_percpu_irq(arch_timer_ppi[PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI], 0);
> }
>
> - /* Find the closest power of two to the divisor */
> - evt_stream_div = arch_timer_rate / ARCH_TIMER_EVT_STREAM_FREQ;
> - pos = fls(evt_stream_div);
> - if (pos > 1 && !(evt_stream_div & (1 << (pos - 2))))
> - pos--;
> - arch_counter_set_user_access(min(pos, 15));
> + arch_timer_initialise();
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -267,6 +273,31 @@ static struct notifier_block arch_timer_cpu_nb __cpuinitdata = {
> .notifier_call = arch_timer_cpu_notify,
> };
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> +static int arch_timer_cpu_pm_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
> + unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + if (action == CPU_PM_EXIT)
> + arch_timer_initialise();
> +
> + return NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static struct notifier_block arch_timer_cpu_pm_notifier = {
> + .notifier_call = arch_timer_cpu_pm_notify,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init arch_timer_cpu_pm_init(void)
> +{
> + return cpu_pm_register_notifier(&arch_timer_cpu_pm_notifier);
> +}
> +#else
> +static int __init arch_timer_cpu_pm_init(void)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> static int __init arch_timer_register(void)
> {
> int err;
> @@ -316,11 +347,17 @@ static int __init arch_timer_register(void)
> if (err)
> goto out_free_irq;
>
> + err = arch_timer_cpu_pm_init();
> + if (err)
> + goto out_unreg_notify;
> +
> /* Immediately configure the timer on the boot CPU */
> arch_timer_setup(this_cpu_ptr(arch_timer_evt));
>
> return 0;
>
> +out_unreg_notify:
> + unregister_cpu_notifier(&arch_timer_cpu_nb);
> out_free_irq:
> if (arch_timer_use_virtual)
> free_percpu_irq(arch_timer_ppi[VIRT_PPI], arch_timer_evt);
--
Tixy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-18 17:06 [PATCH 0/4] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] drivers: clocksource: configure event stream for ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] ARM: arch_timer: add macros for bits in control register Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] ARM/ARM64: arch_timer: remove __cpuinit attribute for arch_counter_set_user_access Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:58 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-06-18 17:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-02 16:09 ` Jon Medhurst (Tixy) [this message]
2013-07-02 17:24 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drivers: clocksource: configure event stream for ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 10:23 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-07-23 10:33 ` Will Deacon
2013-07-23 11:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-07-25 9:45 ` [PATCH v3 " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-12 13:32 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: arch_timer: add macros for bits in control register Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:21 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-02 9:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-02 9:48 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-02 9:55 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-02 12:12 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-05 16:25 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-06 8:09 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-06 9:01 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-12 13:16 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ARM/ARM64: arch_timer: add macros for bits in control register Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 8:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-14 9:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-08-14 9:23 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] drivers: clocksource: configure event stream for ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ARM: arch_timer: configure and enable event stream Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM64: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 13:27 ` Will Deacon
2013-08-20 14:27 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 16:16 ` Will Deacon
2013-08-20 16:23 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 17:08 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-21 17:52 ` Will Deacon
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] drivers: clocksource: enable hwcaps for event stream on ARM arch timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 17:29 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] drivers: clocksource: add CPU PM notifier for ARM architected timer Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 9:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM/ARM64 architected timer updates Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-14 9:17 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 10:51 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-14 11:03 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 15:00 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-08-20 17:14 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-23 9:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2013-08-23 9:57 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1372781381.3689.27.camel@linaro1.home \
--to=tixy@linaro.org \
--cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).