From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFT] irqchip: sun4i: Remove wrong irq_ack callback implementation
Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2013 22:35:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1373121329.13289.2.camel@phoenix> (raw)
According to the datasheet[1], the Interrupt IRQ Pending Registers are
read-only. The implementation of sun4i_irq_ack() looks wrong because it writes
to these read-only registers.
This patch removes the wrong irq_ack callback implementation and all the code
writing to these read-only registers in sun4i_of_init().
[1] http://dl.linux-sunxi.org/A10/A10%20User%20Manual%20-%20v1.20%20%282012-04-09%2c%20DECRYPTED%29.pdf
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
---
Hi Maxime,
I don't have this hardware, I'd appreciate if you can test this patch.
If this patch works, I think we can just drop the patch I sent yesterday.
( It's "irqchip: sun4i: Staticize sun4i_irq_ack()"
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/5/43 )
Thanks,
Axel
drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 18 ------------------
1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
index b66d4ae..29b75c0a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
@@ -38,18 +38,6 @@ static struct irq_domain *sun4i_irq_domain;
static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry sun4i_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
-void sun4i_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
-{
- unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
- unsigned int irq_off = irq % 32;
- int reg = irq / 32;
- u32 val;
-
- val = readl(sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
- writel(val | (1 << irq_off),
- sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
-}
-
static void sun4i_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
{
unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
@@ -76,7 +64,6 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
.name = "sun4i_irq",
- .irq_ack = sun4i_irq_ack,
.irq_mask = sun4i_irq_mask,
.irq_unmask = sun4i_irq_unmask,
};
@@ -114,11 +101,6 @@ static int __init sun4i_of_init(struct device_node *node,
writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(1));
writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(2));
- /* Clear all the pending interrupts */
- writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(0));
- writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(1));
- writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(2));
-
/* Enable protection mode */
writel(0x01, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PROTECTION_REG);
--
1.8.1.2
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-06 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-06 14:35 Axel Lin [this message]
2013-07-11 16:13 ` [PATCH RFT] irqchip: sun4i: Remove wrong irq_ack callback implementation Maxime Ripard
2013-07-19 9:29 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-07-24 9:51 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-19 8:20 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1373121329.13289.2.camel@phoenix \
--to=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox