From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752539Ab3GIQT6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:19:58 -0400 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:59087 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752474Ab3GIQTz (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jul 2013 12:19:55 -0400 Message-ID: <1373386794.14604.14.camel@joe-AO722> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] firmware/dmi_scan: Fix most checkpatch errors and warnings From: Joe Perches To: Jean Delvare Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ben Hutchings , Andrew Morton Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:19:54 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1373384574.4391.9.camel@chaos.site> References: <1373384438.4391.6.camel@chaos.site> <1373384574.4391.9.camel@chaos.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.4-0ubuntu1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2013-07-09 at 17:42 +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > Fix all errors and trivial warnings reported by checkpatch for file > drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c. trivia: > +++ linux-3.11-rc0/drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c 2013-07-09 16:08:13.979592957 +0200 > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static char * __init dmi_string(const st > if (str != NULL) > strcpy(str, bp); > else > - printk(KERN_ERR "dmi_string: cannot allocate %Zu bytes.\n", len); > + pr_err("dmi_string: cannot allocate %Zu bytes.\n", len); If the function name is used in every printk, it might be better to add #define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s: " fmt, __func__ before any #include If not, then I suggest removing the embedded function names and writing these as pr_err("%s: etc...", __func__, etc...); This eliminates any possible function name mismatch. > @@ -217,7 +220,7 @@ static void __init dmi_save_one_device(i > > dev = dmi_alloc(sizeof(*dev) + strlen(name) + 1); > if (!dev) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "dmi_save_one_device: out of memory.\n"); > + pr_err("dmi_save_one_device: out of memory.\n"); OOM messages generally aren't useful. dmi_alloc is either a trivial front-end to kmalloc, and kmalloc already does a dump_stack() when OOM, or for x86, dmi_alloc uses extend_brk which BUGs when unsuccessful. x86/ia64 do have a slight mismatch in dmi_alloc as x86 does a memset(0), and ia64 just does kmalloc.