linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: gleb@redhat.com
Cc: avi.kivity@gmail.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 03/12] KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 21:02:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1375189330-24066-4-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375189330-24066-1-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Currently, kvm zaps the large spte if write-protected is needed, the later
read can fault on that spte. Actually, we can make the large spte readonly
instead of making them un-present, the page fault caused by read access can
be avoided

The idea is from Avi:
| As I mentioned before, write-protecting a large spte is a good idea,
| since it moves some work from protect-time to fault-time, so it reduces
| jitter.  This removes the need for the return value.

[
  It has fixed the issue reported in 6b73a9606 by stopping fast page fault
  marking the large spte to writable
]

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index cf163ca..35d4b50 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1181,8 +1181,7 @@ static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
 
 /*
  * Write-protect on the specified @sptep, @pt_protect indicates whether
- * spte writ-protection is caused by protecting shadow page table.
- * @flush indicates whether tlb need be flushed.
+ * spte write-protection is caused by protecting shadow page table.
  *
  * Note: write protection is difference between drity logging and spte
  * protection:
@@ -1191,10 +1190,9 @@ static void drop_large_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep)
  * - for spte protection, the spte can be writable only after unsync-ing
  *   shadow page.
  *
- * Return true if the spte is dropped.
+ * Return true if tlb need be flushed.
  */
-static bool
-spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool *flush, bool pt_protect)
+static bool spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
 {
 	u64 spte = *sptep;
 
@@ -1204,17 +1202,11 @@ spte_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sptep, bool *flush, bool pt_protect)
 
 	rmap_printk("rmap_write_protect: spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
 
-	if (__drop_large_spte(kvm, sptep)) {
-		*flush |= true;
-		return true;
-	}
-
 	if (pt_protect)
 		spte &= ~SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
 	spte = spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
 
-	*flush |= mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
-	return false;
+	return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
 }
 
 static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
@@ -1226,11 +1218,8 @@ static bool __rmap_write_protect(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long *rmapp,
 
 	for (sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter); sptep;) {
 		BUG_ON(!(*sptep & PT_PRESENT_MASK));
-		if (spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, &flush, pt_protect)) {
-			sptep = rmap_get_first(*rmapp, &iter);
-			continue;
-		}
 
+		flush |= spte_write_protect(kvm, sptep, pt_protect);
 		sptep = rmap_get_next(&iter);
 	}
 
@@ -2701,6 +2690,8 @@ static int __direct_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t v, int write,
 			break;
 		}
 
+		drop_large_spte(vcpu, iterator.sptep);
+
 		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(*iterator.sptep)) {
 			u64 base_addr = iterator.addr;
 
@@ -2855,7 +2846,7 @@ fast_pf_fix_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
  * - false: let the real page fault path to fix it.
  */
 static bool fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, int level,
-			    u32 error_code)
+			    u32 error_code, bool force_pt_level)
 {
 	struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
@@ -2884,6 +2875,13 @@ static bool fast_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, int level,
 		goto exit;
 
 	/*
+	 * Can not map the large spte to writable if the page is dirty
+	 * logged.
+	 */
+	if (sp->role.level > PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL && force_pt_level)
+		goto exit;
+
+	/*
 	 * Check if it is a spurious fault caused by TLB lazily flushed.
 	 *
 	 * Need not check the access of upper level table entries since
@@ -2944,7 +2942,7 @@ static int nonpaging_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t v, u32 error_code,
 	} else
 		level = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
 
-	if (fast_page_fault(vcpu, v, level, error_code))
+	if (fast_page_fault(vcpu, v, level, error_code, force_pt_level))
 		return 0;
 
 	mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq;
@@ -3422,7 +3420,7 @@ static int tdp_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gpa, u32 error_code,
 	} else
 		level = PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL;
 
-	if (fast_page_fault(vcpu, gpa, level, error_code))
+	if (fast_page_fault(vcpu, gpa, level, error_code, force_pt_level))
 		return 0;
 
 	mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq;
-- 
1.8.1.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-30 13:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-30 13:01 [RFC PATCH 00/12] KVM: MMU: locklessly wirte-protect Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:01 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: MMU: remove unused parameter Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-29  7:22   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: MMU: properly check last spte in fast_page_fault() Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-08-02 14:55   ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: MMU: lazily drop large spte Marcelo Tosatti
2013-08-02 15:42     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-02 20:27       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-08-02 22:56         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: MMU: log dirty page after marking spte writable Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:26   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31  7:25     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-07  1:48   ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-08-07  4:06     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-08 15:06       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-08-08 16:26         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-11-20  0:29       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-11-20  0:35         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-11-20 14:20         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-11-20 19:47           ` Marcelo Tosatti
2013-11-21  4:26             ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: MMU: add spte into rmap before logging dirty page Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:27   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-07-31  7:33     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 06/12] KVM: MMU: flush tlb if the spte can be locklessly modified Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28  7:23   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-28  7:50     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: MMU: redesign the algorithm of pte_list Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28  8:12   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-28  8:37     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28  8:58       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-28  9:19         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 08/12] KVM: MMU: introduce nulls desc Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28  8:40   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-28  8:54     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: MMU: introduce pte-list lockless walker Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28  9:20   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-28  9:33     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28  9:46       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-28 10:13         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28 10:49           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-28 12:15             ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-28 13:36               ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-29  6:50                 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-29  9:08                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-29  9:31                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-29  9:51                       ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-29 11:26                         ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-30 11:38                           ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-02  7:02                             ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-29  9:31                   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-29 11:33                     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-29 12:02                       ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-30 11:44                         ` Gleb Natapov
2013-09-02  8:50                           ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: MMU: allow locklessly access shadow page table out of vcpu thread Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-07 13:09   ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-08-07 13:19     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-29  9:10   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-29  9:25     ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: MMU: locklessly write-protect the page Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:02 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: MMU: clean up spte_write_protect Xiao Guangrong
2013-07-30 13:11 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] KVM: MMU: locklessly wirte-protect Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-03  5:09 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2013-08-04 14:15   ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-29  7:16   ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-06 13:16 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-08-08 17:38   ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-08-09  4:51     ` Xiao Guangrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1375189330-24066-4-git-send-email-xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).